First Brutus appealed to the crowed by doing himself seem no better than the people. and rationalized the blackwash by demoing that he and his fellow plotters killed Caesar non for at that place ain addition. but for the greater good of the general populace. We see this in the quotation mark not that I love Caesar less. but I love Rome more” . This useful point of position went over rather good with the people. so good in fact that they tried to give Brutus the Crown. but he refused it which subsequently turned out to possibly non be the best pick. On the impudent side of the statements Antonym appealed to the people of Rome by stating them what they knew all along. that Caesar was a great swayer that he cared about all of them. But he did non merely state the people this. he went a measure further and showed the people the will that Caesar left behind which left all his belongings to the people. and gave 75 dram to every adult male. This truly made the people think about what Brutus said about Caesar before because Antony had proof to endorse up the fact that Caesar cared about the people. which is what they were looking for in the beginning.
Following. both talkers were able to carry through what they did because of there usage of sarcasm. Brutus used the sarcasm that he had to kill his best friend to accomplish the greater good for the people. and when he showed the people this they accepted what had happened and agreed that it was the right thing to make. But Antonym took the usage of sarcasm a measure further than Brutus did. He accomplished this by demoing the people the sarcasm of naming the plotters honorable men” . This happened when Antonym told the people all the good things that Caesar did. and the failings that Caesar had. and after which he jeeringly agreed with the plotters with his concluding being that these were honorable men” . Although Brutus had the credence of the crowd ab initio. the turning point for Antony was his usage of sarcasm. which sealed the determination of the people to side with Antony against the plotters.
Finally both Brutus and Antony were able to convert the people of there points of position because of there converting usage of the rules of human behaviour. One of the rules of human behaviour provinces that people are frequently influenced by a person’s repute. instead than the soundness of their statements. Both talkers used at that place fame. political prestigiousness and there close relation ships to Caesar to endorse up at that place statements. which tended to rock the crowed one manner or another. Besides the people compel themselves to hold against one side or another because of the rule that says: people offer irrational grounds for mistrusting others. This is best seen when the rabble killed the poet cassis because he had the same name as the plotter cassis.
In decision both Brutus and Antony accomplished what they ab initio set out to make ( even if it was merely for a twosome of proceedingss ) through there ability to appeal to the crowd. point out the sarcasm of the state of affairs. and the usage of the rules of human behaviour. But in the terminal Antony was the 1 that got the peoples commitment. this can be because of the fact that Antony was a better talker. pointed out more sarcasm in the state of affairs. used more rules of human behaviour than Brutus. or it could be something every bit simple as the faithlessness of the crowd and the fortune that Antony spoke last.