Critically discuss how, through the ages, banks have changed and evolved

Published: 2020-05-29 00:21:04
3202 words
12 pages
printer Print
essay essay

Category: Cultural

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

GET MY ESSAY
The growing of the banking sector since its creative activity in the 1600’s has allowed for Bankss to alter and germinate into being more than merely a concern. Critically discuss how, through the ages, Bankss have changed and evolved. Make mention in your reply to how ordinance, fiscal crisis and societies demands have aided this banking development.
B.
1. What is a bank?
There is no comprehensive legal definition of the term ‘bank’ , ‘banker’ or ‘banking’ . So to specify these constructs, people has to look at the peculiar fortunes in which the precise significance of them arises. The most common fortunes are: the country of bank ordinance ; where rights and responsibilities are granted to Bankss ; and where there is an attempt to shun a payment duty that it arose on an illegal contract, which is null or unenforceable because it is owed by or to an unaccredited bank. [ 1 ]
There are two grounds why the common jurisprudence definition of these constructs remains of import. The first 1 is under jurisprudence, certain rights and responsibilities are merely conferred on a ‘bank’ or ‘banker’ , e.g. the banker’s responsibility of confidentiality. The 2nd 1 is some regulations use the term ‘bank’ , ‘banker’ or ‘banking’ without an accurate definition. We can see it clearer in the instance ofKirkwood:[ 2 ] Kirkwood’s defense mechanism was that UDT could non retrieve on a debt because they were neither an unregistered usurer nor a bank and the loan was illegal as it infringed the commissariats of the Moneylenders Act 1990. Lord Denninghas stated that:
‘Parliament has conferred many privileges on Bankss ” and bankers ” , but it has ne’er defined what is a bank ” and who is a banker ” . It has said many times that a banker is a individual who carries on the concern of banking ” , but it has ne’er told us what the concern of banking is. It has imposed punishments on individuals who describe themselves as a bank ” or bankers ” when they are non, but it has ne’er told us how to make up one’s mind whether or non they are bankers.’ [ 3 ]
To find if a individual is a banker or non, the Court specified three elements:the nature of the banking services provided ; the celebrity of the organisation ; the importance of these services in relation to concern as a whole.[ 4 ] The features of banking was:accepting money and roll uping checks for their clients and put them to the recognition of the customers’ histories ; honoring checks or orders drawn on bankers by their clients when presented for payment and debiting their clients consequently ; maintaining current histories, or something of that nature, in which debits and credits were entered.[ 5 ]
Hsiao enounced that a bank must hold merely two typical elements, viz. sedimentation pickings and check aggregation. [ 6 ] However he so rejected the possibility of this definition in replying the inquiry: ‘what is a bank? ’ Because Bankss are classified in different ways, some establishments will fall into the banking class despite non holding two elements stated in theKirkwoodinstance. [ 7 ]
The reply for this job can be found in some legislative acts. Harmonizing to the European Union, a bank can be understood as‘an set abouting the concern of which is to have sedimentations or other repayable financess from the populace and to allow credits for its ain account’. [ 8 ] The Banking Act 2009 defines that ‘bank means a UK establishment which has permission under of the Financial the regulated activity of accepting deposits.’[ 9 ] Pursuant to The Bills of Exchange Act 1882, a‘banker includes a organic structure of individuals whether incorporated or non who carry on the concern of banking’[ 10 ]
2. The innovation of banking in United Kingdom
Galbraith argues the equivocal beginnings of the bankers. He claims that Bankss are‘an extremely old thought. Banking has a significant being in Roman times… So far as any concern can be given cultural association, banking belongs to the Italians.’[ 11 ]
In United Kingdom, the banking system extensively developed without the intervention by authorities. It started due to the renting-vault of the goldsmith’s banker. [ 12 ] They had been recognized as dependable keepers of money for people without their ain safe vault. At this beginning clip, the goldsmith Bankss were merely for affluent people. [ 13 ] In 1640, Charles I seized the gold of the Royal Mint. This action made the trust and belief in goldsmith Bankss grew up so fast, although ulterior Charles I repaid all the money. In 1660, the bank notes were foremost introduced as the goldworker drawn notes, by which a depositor sent his goldworker a missive to authorise the release to his creditor of the amount owed. The creditor would take this ‘note ‘ to the depositor ‘s goldworker and received the payment in hard currency. They have been compared with modern twenty-four hours cheuqes. This map promoted bank loaning and goldworkers could execute both place of borrowers and depositors.
In 1664, Charles II borrowed ?1,300,000 from the goldworkers to construct a seafaring armada. But subsequently he failed to refund this debt and the Exchequer suspended the refund. This occasion raised an anxiousness about the loaner policies of the goldworkers. This industry was going a hazard concern, so goldsmiths decided to hold ‘bank’ individually developed from their usual concern. They called themselves ‘bankers’ but so they were still goldworkers.
Goldsmith bankers had created an infallible system of private banking, which were developed into the celebrated banking houses, some of them still exist today. Orsinger wrote that ‘in 1801 1 could number 68 private Bankss which were their direct descendants’ .[ 14 ]
C. The banking development through ages in UK
1. In 17ThursdayCentury
An of import measure towards the modern banking was the initiation of The Bank of England by the passage of The Bank of England Act 1694. Its original intent was to raise money for the war with France, along with another purpose was to ‘act as the Government’s banker and debt-manager’ . The original capital of the bank was ?1,200,000. It provided a same sum loan to the Government with the involvement was about ?100,000 per twelvemonth. The Government did non refund the loan until 1706, but in exchange the bank was awarded a Royal Charter. It precisely did the same sort of concern goldworkers were making already: publishing their ain notes and imparting money of their ain creative activity.
Parliament brought out an act to modulate fiscal activity in the United Kingdom occurred on 1697 that gave heavy punishments, both fiscal and physical to those worked within the ‘City of London’ without a licence yearly by the Court of Alderman. [ 15 ] This ordinance merely had consequence until the early 18th century. [ 16 ] Harmonizing to Gilligan, the 1697 Act was‘a important legislative enterprise because it was the first effort by any authorities to enforce certain criterions of probity and competency upon those covering in the embryologic securities market’ .[ 17 ]
The creative activity of the Bank of England prescribed an wholly new anchor and regulative mechanism to the modern banking sector. Even though, it was a long and difficult procedure, the Government still tried to convey banking to the bulk of society. They besides started to pull off a crystalline fiscal market every bit good.
2. In 18ThursdayCentury
Banks’ services kept increasing: such as glade installations, security investings and over draft protections. Due to the rightness of lodging their excess balances, the Bank of England changed it proprietor and became the Government’s bank. A new Charter of Parliament in 1708, which clause forbidden note issue to any Bankss with more than six spouses, did non trap single goldworkers bankers. But detained the constitution of joint-stock banking in England until the undermentioned century. It was recognized as a solution to maintain private bank as little partnerships.
The Industrial Revolution farther helped to enlarge the figure of Bankss in United Kingdom, particularly within London. Furthermore, it changed the thought that the Bankss were non merely for the upper categories but besides for ordinary people. [ 18 ]
In a parallel development, there was a separate system of banking was germinating in the states. Since the conveyance and communications in Midland and Northern parts did non be, the London goldsmiths bankers had failed to develop their system outside London. The Industrial Revolution created a demand for fiscal service, particularly at turning industrial and larboard metropoliss such asBirmingham, Liverpool Manchester, and Newcastle. These countryside bankers were local industrialists and bargainers, who already had experiences in pecuniary dealing. There were some similar between ‘industrialist bankers’ and the early goldworker bankers. By 1784, there were 119 provincial Bankss outside London.
The Industrial Revolution had done a batch of things. First, it broadened the popular of Bankss in industrial society but they were still non an accessible installation for everyone. They perfectly focused on the upper category and merchandiser. Just because the bankers still think about the ‘making-money’ intent more than their duty towards society as a whole. Second, with the expansion the range of endeavor, it was necessary for Bankss with more than six spouses, so that larger resources could be gathered. The Charter in 1708 should be abolished.
3. In 19ThursdayCentury
The banking sector in United Kingdom started to transform. The banking industry and legislators eventually understood that ordinary people besides had the demand to utilize the banks’ installations. [ 19 ] In 1810, The Rothwell Savings Bank, the first salvaging bank initiated by Henry Duncan, was created. It was the innovator in promoting the hapless to salvage and subsequently France every bit good as Holland besides applied this banking theoretical account due to its success in Britain. [ 20 ]
In the 18Thursdaycentury, it was illegal to organize a bank with more than six spouses. But a Newcastle lumber merchandiser, Thomas Joplin disagreed with that regulative. Joplin believed that the increasing in figure of fiscal undertakings’ spouses would garner greater resources and cut down hazards. That sentiment was rejected by Parliament. Fortunately, a banking crisis in 1825, which led to new Act in 1826, [ 21 ] made Joplin’s sentiment came true. The new Act permitted‘the constitution of co-partnerships with any figure of stockholders and right of note issue outside a radius of 65 stat mis from the City of London’ .[ 22 ] The first joint-stock bank was Lancaster Banking Company in 1826. With the advantage in big sums of capital, the joint-stock Bankss began to absorb the private Bankss, doing larger concerns. They so developed more subdivisions, a immense system which attempted to convey a more stable construction that suited to the demands of the Industrial Revolution.
In this period, the Bankss wholly adopted the thought appeared during the Industrial Revolution, that the ordinary people could utilize Bankss every bit good as affluent people.[ 23 ]It attracted a batch of people who had already owned histories and who had merely used these fiscal services for the first clip. The development of subdivisions had their ain benefits, but besides showed the bound in hapless communications and deficiency of skilled work forces. Robert Paul described about this job:‘that subdivisions were accompanied with so much jeopardy, required such changeless observation and review, and involved us wholly in such a grade of supervision that, upon the whole, my general feeling is that the subdivisions are non the most advantageous portion of our business.’
4. In Modern Era
The banking system during this clip was affected by two World Wars. A group of bank in control of authorities performed a series of coup d’etats and amalgamations. They were called ‘Big Five’ , including these well-known Bankss: Barclay, Lloyds, Midland, National Provincial, and Westminster. Along with it was the planetary fiscal crisis of 1929-1932, many Bankss experienced serious troubles at that clip. To cover with it, they used the scheme to address less affluent clients and present little economy bundles. It was non until 1950 for a recovery which showed a big extend in provincial subdivision offices and the visual aspect of the high street Bankss.
From the 17Thursdaycentury to this century, there wasn’t any direct statute law applied to the fiscal services industry until 1939. [ 24 ]The Prevention of Fraud ( Investment ) Act 1939was the first major piece of statute law that had object to protect the right of investors. Unlicensed covering was treated as a condemnable offense. The 1939 Act was altered bythe Prevention of Fraud ( Investment ) Amendment Act 1958,which provided the Board of Trade the competency to name surveyors to look into the disposal of unit trusts. [ 25 ] Gillian complimented that these two statute laws‘were noteworthy for the betterments they brought in licensing standards’ .[ 26 ] But harmonizing to Fisher and Bewey, these two were merely regulated a little portion of investing concern and their practical were limited. [ 27 ]
In the aftermath of the secondary banking crisis of 1973-1975, the Parliament of the United Kingdom promulgated theBanking Act 1979. The Bank of England’s regulative powers over Bankss was extended and their depositors were provided better protections. However, this 1979 Act did non hold adequate disincentive to halt the influence of the secondary banking crisis. The skip of banking ordinance under the 1979 Act was clearly showed in the bankruptcy of Johnson Matthey Bank. The Bank of England took over the running of JMB and supplied it a fiscal deliverance bundle of ?245m. Ellinger enounced that‘if JMB had been subjected to the more rigorous supervising applies to accredited deposit-takers ; its fiscal troubles would hold been discovered earlier… following the JMB matter, the inquiry of bank supervising was reviewed by a Committee set up by the Chancellor 1984 and chaired by the governor of the Bank of England’ .[ 28 ]
Between 1974 and 1976, the Labour Government conducted complete statutory inspection and repair of the Prevention of Fraud ( Investments ) Acts and led to theFinancial Services Act 1986.In 1981 with the demand for a new system of fiscal ordinance, this reform procedure started and Professor Gower was appointed to set about a elaborate reappraisal of the legislative protection. On his study in 1983, Professor Gower propounded that a new Investor Protection Act should be enacted to replace the Prevention of Fraud ( Investment ) Acts, based upon self-regulation, capable to authorities surveillance. [ 29 ] In October 1984, the authorities endorsed a bulk of the recommendations made by Professor Gower and published a White Paper. [ 30 ] The 1986 Act came into consequence on 29 April 1988. It had wider range than the Prevention of Fraud ( Investments ) Acts. [ 31 ]
However, the 1986 Act did non modulate all facet of the fiscal services sector, such as banking sector. [ 32 ] Along with it, the bankruptcy of JMB gave rise to the announcement of theBanking Act 1987.It largely abolished and substituted the 1979 Act. The 1987 Act had aim to supply a rigorous supervising in banking activities and to protect depositor’s involvement. But it did non pull off the banker’ minutess, consumer protection or technological promotions. Arora enounced that the Banking Act 1987‘considerable reinforced the powers of the Bank of England to rede, oversee and command the banking sector.’[ 33 ]
The Banking Act 1998transferred the Bank of England’s powers and duties for the supervising of the banking sector and sweeping money market establishments to theFinancial Services Authority( FSA ) , which was old held by the 1987 Act. [ 34 ] Taylor took an sentiment that‘the Bank of England Act 1998 sums to one of the most important alterations to the Bank’s administration, function and maps in its 300-year history. It is surely the most important legislative alteration to impact the Bank since nationalisation in 1946’ .[ 35 ]
In 1997, the Government changed from Conservative to Labour and led to the debut of many new fiscal ordinances. The first 1 was theFinancial Services and Markets Act ( FSMA ) 2000. It provided an equal statutory model for the FSA replacing the different models under which the assorted regulators would run. [ 36 ] The chief map of the Act was‘to make a incorporate system of statutory ordinance to preside over the fiscal services market’ ,[ 37 ] in which the ordinance of mortgages and general insurance concern is besides covered.
But the passage of FSMA was non effectual plenty to halt the bankruptcy of Northern Rock [ 38 ] and the fiscal crisis in 2007. All of this event revealed the uncertainness of the UK banking sector and the disadvantages in fiscal ordinance. The Bank of England had to offer a loan to Northern Rock. Lord Lawson criticized that‘keeping Northern Rock is merely exposing the taxpayer to hazard, raising issues of unjust competition and go oning a bad repute for the UK in this field.’[ 39 ] Because the old Banking Acts couldn’t halt the crisis, the Parliament has issued the newBanking Act 2009. It regulates new facets: the particular declaration government ; the bank disposal process ; the new bank insolvency process ; inter-bank payments systems ; fiscal services compensation strategy ; and to beef up the function of the Bank of England. TheEconomistdeclaimed that the Act‘shows a alteration in doctrine by the Government and regulators alike.’[ 40 ] Its intent is to give the bank clip to respond internally before the media and the clients become cognizant of the bank problems. The 2009 Act is merely a solution to a individual state of affairs but non a remedy for future jobs.
The Financial Services Act 2010 increases FSA statutory power in different facets, including: consumer consciousness, recovery programs for Bankss and wage policies.

What the Act purposes to make is to give the bank clip to respond internally before the media and the clients become cognizant of the bank problems. This clause causes contention. Peter Thal-Larsen propounded that the Act will fundamentally let fiscal governments to take early action to travel rescuers ‘ sedimentations from a neglecting bank before undertaking other jobs without doing widespread terror. The thought is that, if there is a bank that gets into problem, to insulate it and do the wider impact of that less, but I do n’t believe they can really halt Bankss from acquiring into problem in the hereafter ” . [ 41 ]


There is still a duality here. The FSA and the several fiscal statute law is meant to be crystalline and client focussing. By keep backing information so that the Bankss can move rapidly without bank tallies, you are non leting clients to take what to make with theirown nest eggs, in a timely manner. This cloak of secretiveness goes against the FSA ethos.


Conversely, by keep backing this information and throwing the cloak of secretiveness around the Bankss shoulders you may be able to suppress the terror that we saw in the Northern Rock instance.


Another point of position that could be entertained here is that with consumer assurance at an all clip low, holding a clause like this lone heightens the misgiving of the Bankss.


Consumers may experience even more stray and excluded from being the maestro over their ain pecuniary fate. See lecture 12 on fiscal exclusion.

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!

GET UNIQUE ESSAY

We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read