Explaining Polices Statutory Powers Of Stop And Search Law Essay

Published: 2020-07-16 13:05:04
3724 words
14 pages
printer Print
essay essay

Category: Law

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 ( PACE ) along with its codifications of pattern, provides the foundation and construction for patroling powers and secures these patroling powers around halt and hunt, apprehension, detainment, probe, designation and interviewing detainees.
Whilst adhering to the above PACE must besides happen the right balance between the powers of the constabulary and the rights and freedoms of the populace. This balance is most of import and is cardinal in order for PACE to work.
This assignment will explicate the exercising of Police Officers statutory powers of halt and hunt to a individual and vehicle subdivisions 1 – 7 under the PACE Act, it will besides explicate the rights of a suspect detained along with its precautions in respects to hunts and the account of Bail.
Statutory Powers of Stop and Search Sections 1 – 7
Sections 1 – 7 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984[ 2 ]defines the rights of Police Officers statutory powers for halt and hunt.
1. Power of Constable to halt and seek individual ( s ) , vehicles etc
A Police Officer carries powers to seek any individual or vehicle ( inside and outside ) in any topographic point where the populace have entree, nevertheless this does non use to the individual ‘s home.
However the Police Officer must warrant the hunt to the full by holding sensible evidences for surmising that the individual or vehicle carries a forbidden or stolen article/firework or an violative arm.
If the suspect or vehicle appears to be on land attached to a home i.e. pace, garden etc, the constabulary officer can merely hold powers to seek if he/she has sensible evidences to believe that the suspect or vehicle does non shack in the home or that the suspect/vehicle has no permission to be on the home in inquiry
The subdivision besides states that a Police Officer may merely prehend an article if he/she believes it to be stolen or prohibited.
An article would be prohibited if it was made or adapted with the purposes of being used to perpetrate an offense or if was carried for the intents of passing it to some other individual to utilize to perpetrate an offense.
The offenses in inquiry would be the followers ; –
Offenses under Section 12 of the Theft Act 1968[ 3 ]
Fraud ( Contrary to Section 1 of the Fraud Act 2006 )[ 4 ]
Offenses under Section 1 of Criminal Damage Act 1971[ 5 ]
The article must be in relation to an offense committed or which was to be committed under Section 139 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988[ 6 ]
A pyrotechnic in this subdivision is construed in conformity as in Section 1 ( 1 ) of the Fireworks Act 2003[ 7 ]
An violative arm reverse to this portion in this act means any article made or adapted for the usage of doing hurt to a individual by the individual transporting the arm or purposes of the individual to manus it to some other individual to be used.
2. Commissariats made associating to the hunt
A Police Officer must demo documental grounds if he or she is non in their policing uniform.
It would besides be common pattern for the Officer to give his name, station and explain to the fishy his grounds ) for the hunt, it would besides be common pattern to explicate the demands from the hunt and the sum of clip the hunt is likely to take.
If a Police Officer searched an unattended vehicle, he/she must go forth a notice saying the vehicle has been searched, the station in which the Police Officer is attached to, an application for compensation can be made for any harm that may hold occurred due to the hunt and that a record of the hunt has been made.
As aforementioned the Police Officer must explicate to the suspect that the hunt will take as much clip as moderately required.
It is merely permitted for the outer vesture of the suspect to be removed. The Police Officer must besides roll up a written study of every incident occurred. The written studies may halt jobs where persons ‘ receive arbitrary ( mistreating the power ) hunts. The written study will be compiled every bit shortly as operable.
3. Duty to roll up a written study refering the hunt
A note of the individual ‘s name may be taken if it is made cognizant to the Police Officer, nevertheless the Police Officer can non confine the individual for the intents of holding his/her name. If the Police Officer was non made aware of the individual ‘s name, a description of the individual must be included in the written study. The same applies for vehicles.
The written study of the hunt must incorporate: –
The Object of the hunt
The evidences for doing the hunt
The day of the month and clip in which the hunt was conducted
The topographic point in which the hunt was conducted
Whether anything was found and if so, what?
If there were any individual ( s ) or belongings damaged due to the hunt being conducted.
Identifying the Police Officer doing the study
The individual or individual in charge of the vehicle searched is entitled to a transcript of the written study within 12 months of the day of the month of the hunt.
4. Road Checks
This subdivision of the act sets out the behavior in which Police Officers must transport when carry oning a route cheque to determine whether the vehicle is transporting: –
A individual who has committed an offense other than a route traffic offense
A individual is a informant to an offense
A individual is meaning on perpetrating an offense
A individual who is unlawfully at big
A route cheque is conducted in relation to Section 163 of the Road Traffic Act 1988[ 8 ]
The Road cheque must merely be conducted when authorised in authorship by a police officer of the rank Superintendant and supra when he or she has sensible evidences to believe that the offense is an chargeable offense and for surmising that the individual is, or is about to be in the vicinity in which vehicles would be stopped if the route cheques were authorised.
A Police Officer under the rank of Superintendant may merely empower a route cheque to be conducted, if it were to be a affair of urgency and for the same grounds as aforementioned. The empowering Officer must roll up a written record of the clip the mandate was given and to inform an officer of the rank superintendant and above of the mandate every bit shortly as it ‘s appropriate.
Following the presentment to the higher officer, he/she may empower in composing for the cheques to go on. If the officer decides to halt the cheques so he/she must in written record the clip the cheques finished and for why were the cheques made.
A note must besides be made of the vicinity of the cheques conducted. The empowering officer can besides ( within seven yearss ) decide whether or non the cheques are to go on and that they will be conducted at times specified.
Every written officer must stipulate in their written mandate: –
Name of the empowering officer
Stipulate the intent of the route cheque
Stipulate the vicinity where the cheques were conducted
The proprietor in charge of a vehicle checked has a period ( non transcending 12 months ) in which he/she is entitled to a written transcript of the grounds for the cheques made.
5. Reports of recorded route cheques and hunts
Every one-year study under Section 22 of the Police Act 1996[ 9 ]or made by the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis contains information about hunts recorded under subdivision 3 ( Duty to roll up a written study refering the hunt ) and subdivision 4 ( route cheques ) .
The information contains the entire Numberss of hunts each month associating to stolen articles, Offensive arms and other forbidden articles. The study will besides incorporate the entire Numberss of apprehensions made each month effect to the hunts conducted.
The study will besides incorporate information on the route cheques conducted, the ground for the cheques and its consequences.
6. Statutory Morticians and 7. Auxiliary
This subdivision states that any police officer employed as a statutory mortician i.e. organic structures authorised by legislative act to run a railroad, conveyance, seaport or dock in which they employ their ain constabulary force e.g. The British Transport Police.
A constable employed by a statutory mortician may halt, detain and hunt any vehicle before it leaves the goods country. However a constable employed by a statutory mortician does non transport the rights to halt a individual.
Any hunt conducted must be justified with sensible evidences of intuition and recorded.
This subdivision states that certain passing ‘s of Torahs by legislative organic structures shall discontinue to hold consequence ( as stated in subdivision 7 ) .
The Codes of Practice[ 10 ]within the PACE Act sets out parametric quantities in which the Police Officers must follow. PACE Code A sets out the counsel for halt and hunt i.e. it explains to Police Officers what sensible intuition is hence decreasing persons from torment due to their visual aspect or old condemnable record.
Statisticss shows that Black people are 26 times more likely than white people to be stopped and searched by constabulary officers in England and Wales, this analysis of authorities informations has brought claims of favoritism from candidates who say the findings corroborate concerns that black and Asiatic Britishers are being below the belt targeted ” .[ 11 ]
About 70,000 people who were stopped and searched had committed no offense demoing that merely 13 % were arrested after the hunt. The sum of hunts conducted has increased tenfold since 1986.[ 12 ]
Here are the advantages collated from different members of the populace in their positions towards halt and hunt: –
May discourage a offense from happening
Gun Crime is on the addition and hence stop and hunt may do members of the public feel more secure ( nevertheless this depends on the country in inquiry )
Young person Crime is besides on the addition as immature grownups see it as ‘cool ‘ to be involved in immature offense, hence halt and hunt can halt a offense from happening
Olympic Games are up and coming in 2012 in London, People will experience more unafraid knowing that within justifiable grounds a individual may be stopped if under sensible intuition.
Stop and hunt can merely be conducted in public topographic points, therefore it would be believed that the hunt would hold to be conducted right as other members of the populace would be within distance
Stop and Search tries to advance assurance within the community and along with this promote apprehension
It is a utile maneuver when used in the right mode
The members of the populace besides their rights and besides there are ailments signifiers available for any plaintiff
Young grownups ( Hoodies ) , Black or Asiatic people, males etc, are targeted more than others
Certain countries are more common than others for people to be stopped and searched
Stop and Search can go unuseful when used in the wrong manner
The cultural minority seem to be targeted for terrorist act more than the white population. Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000[ 13 ]provinces that any police officer can halt and seek anyone or any vehicle that is in a specific country. As shown in instance Patricia ARMANI DA SILVA against the United Kingdom[ 14 ]Brazilian born Jean Charles de Menezes was shot dead by a member of the metropolitan constabulary when mistaken as a suicide bomber, merely two hebdomads after four self-destruction bombers detonated detonations on the London conveyance web. Three were on belowground trains and one was on a coach this resulted in 56 people being killed.
It can be an invasion on a individual ‘s privateness
Very small intelligence is gained through halt and hunt itself
Merely 13 % of halt and hunts lead to an apprehension being made
Rights of a detainee held at a constabulary station
A detainee is a individual that is held in detention. The PACE Code C 2008[ 15 ]sets out the demands for the detainment, intervention and inquiring of suspects in constabulary detention, nevertheless this does non associate to terrorist act.
Many members of the populace, at some point in their lives, justly or wrongly will go under the attending of the constabulary. Every individual arrested and detained must be made cognizant of their rights and responsibilities.
A individual can be arrested and taken into detention with or without a warrant. Section 1.1 of the PACE Code C 2008 states All individuals in detention must be dealt with efficiently, and released every bit shortly as the demand for detainment no longer applies. ”
When taken into detention, the constabulary have the power to confine and keep the suspect for oppugning if they suspect that an imprisonable offense has been committed.
If the suspect is detained, he/she can merely be detained for a clip non transcending 24 hours after the detainment started or before if there are no evidences for intuition if arrested. However a higher superior officer may widen this period of clip by an excess 12 hours, and a magistrates tribunal can widen detainment for a 96 hr period and so fostering the bound to 28 yearss if required.
However if the suspect has been detained for a clip period longer than 24 hours the detainee must be brought before a magistrates tribunal the undermentioned twenty-four hours ( excepting weekends, Christmas Day or Good Friday ) .
An account must be made to the detainee on why they are being detained, and the detainee must be handed the codifications of pattern as stated in Section 3.1 of Code C. The suspect is entitled to legal representation instantly. This representation can be made by a personal meeting or through telephone contact from the Criminal Service Defence Direct. The suspect can besides do one more individual cognizant of his/her detainment and where they are detained. The detainee has the right to a telephone call or to compose a missive, the call or missive may be monitored nevertheless the telephone call to the canvasser must be done in private. All the aforementioned are stated in Section 58 of the PACE Act[ 16 ]
The detainee can have free legal advice from a responsibility canvasser, nevertheless this depends entirely on the detainees fiscal circumstance. The detained individual may besides wish to seek advice from their ain independent canvasser, this will depend on whether the offense is a serious offense or non. The detainee is good within his/her rights to decline replying anymore inquiries one time legal advice has been given.
A detainee besides has the right to be treated with self-respect, nutrient, drink and exercising, entree to toilet and lavation installations, a warm clean ventilated room with bedclothes and at least eight hours rest in a 24 hr period.
If the detainee is a minor, and under the age of 16 or is mentally vulnerable, so the constabulary must state an appropriate grownup such as the defender or parents every bit shortly as operable. Unless there is intuition that the defender or parent is involved in the offense in inquiry so the constabulary may let the defender or parent to go to the constabulary station and hold entree to the immature or mentally vulnerable individual.
The suspect must hold the above rights given to them in manner of composing along with written verification that the suspect was given his/her agreements for obtaining legal advice, a right to the transcript of the detention record, the cautiousness in the footings prescribed in Section 10 of the PACE Codes C, an extra written notice briefly puting out their entitlements whilst in detainment. It is besides a demand to hold the detainee to subscribe this written notice, if the detainee refuses to subscribe, so this must be noted down on the detention record.
The Police besides hold powers to seek, take fingerprints, thenar prints, take exposure etc. A particular warrant is required in respects to internal hunts.
An wrongdoer can non be detained more than one time for the same offense.
If any of the processs aforementioned have non been followed, the detainee may wish to kick through the right process. Ailments can be made if the suspect ‘s rights were infringed or breached. The suspect has a right to claim and the constabulary may be disciplined or prosecuted for the maltreatment of rights of misconduct.
Ailments can be made to the local constabulary station, independent constabulary ailments committees, or a canvasser.
Precautions in relation to subsequent hunts
Upon arrest, the responsibility officer must take into history all of the detainee ‘s ownerships and have them recorded as stated in Section 54 of the PACE Act[ 17 ]. For these ownerships to be attained a hunt must be conducted. An officer of the same sex must carry on the hunt, and the officer may utilize sensible force necessary if the suspect refuses to collaborate.
There are different types of hunts: –
Strip Search – This sort of hunt would be made if the custody/searching officer decide that the fishy holds on his/her individual e.g. a forbidden point or an violative arm, or any article that may be used as an violative arm. The hunt requires more than the outer vesture to be removed. This hunt would necessitate the same sex officer to carry on the hunt and an appropriate grownup may be present if requested. The hunt and its ground ( s ) must be recorded in the detention record.
Intimate Body Searches – This hunt consists of a physical scrutiny of any one or more of the suspects ‘ bodily openings excepting merely the oral cavity, and is merely authorised by an officer ranking at least as an inspector.
Search of an immediate country after an apprehension – The constabulary are allowed to seek the immediate country in which the apprehension took topographic point and this includes any homes or edifices that the suspect may hold come from old to the apprehension taking topographic point. This is stated in Section 32 of the PACE Act. The hunts of belongings itself is set in PACE Code B[ 18 ]
Search of the suspects premises after the apprehension – If the suspect has been arrested, the constabulary have the right to seek the suspects place or any other premises that the suspects may be in charge of ( such as concern ) , due to it being related to the offense arrested for Section 18 of the PACE Act[ 19 ]The constabulary must hold sensible evidences to believe that the premises has something which relates to the offense
The three chief intents for these hunts under Section 32 of the PACE Act[ 20 ]are for the undermentioned three articles –
Evidence associating to an offense
Anything the suspect might utilize to get away
Anything that the suspect might show as a danger to himself, the constabulary officers or others.
Types of Bail
Section 1 ( 1 ) of the Bail Act 1976 states In this Act bond in condemnable proceedings ” means-
( a ) bond grantable in or in connexion with proceedings for an offense to a individual who is accused or convicted of the offense, or
( B ) bond grantable in connexion with an offense to a individual who is under apprehension for the offense or for whose apprehension for the offense a warrant ( endorsed for bond ) is being issued.[ 21 ]
Bail is a security, normally in agencies of a amount of money, which is exchanged for the release of an arrested individual as a warrant of that individual ‘s visual aspect for test.
The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994[ 22 ]ensures that Bail can be granted by the constabulary, when a suspect is released without charge, nevertheless the suspect is on a status that he/she must re-emerge to the constabulary station on a day of the month specified by the constabulary. Section 4 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003[ 23 ]provinces that Police Officers can allow street bond for minor offenses committed.
The Magistrates and Crown Courts besides have the power and right to allow Bail.
There are two types of Bail: –
Conditional Bail is when the constabulary or tribunals authorise bond for an wrongdoer, nevertheless this mandate is made with restrictions and demands. These restrictions are required to guarantee that the wrongdoer:
Attends Courts when called upon
Does non re-offend
Does non interfere with informants
Common restrictions and limitations would include
The suspect would non be allowed within a certain distance of a informant ‘s place
The suspect is capable to a curfew
The tribunals can besides allow conditions that meet the suspects ain protection, this is most likely granted in instances affecting a kid or immature individual.
Unconditional bond
Unconditional bond is granted when the constabulary or tribunals believe that it is really improbable that the suspect will re-offend, will go to tribunal when required and will non interfere with the justness procedure. Therefore the bond is granted without restrictions or limitations.
If a suspect fails to stay by the bond conditions granted, or fails to go to tribunal on the day of the month stated by the tribunals, so the suspect is in breach of his/her bail.A The suspect is most likely to be arrested and a backdown of the bond would be made. Failure to follow with Bail limitations and restrictions can besides ensue in refusal of farther Bail and the suspect will besides be remanded in detention until farther notice.A It is besides a condemnable offense under Section 7 of the Bail Act 1976[ 24 ]when a suspect fails to look at tribunal at the day of the month and clip required.
Refusal of Bail
There are many grounds as to why an wrongdoer may be refused bond. However the chief grounds of refusal are due to the followers: –
Courts believe that the suspect will neglect to return to Court
Interfering with informants involved in the instance
Likelihood of perpetrating farther offenses is high as shown in instance R. V Allen ( David ) Court of Appeal ( Criminal Division )[ 25 ]where the plaintiff in error committed deceitful offenses when on bond and was hence arrested and brought back into detention
There are several factors that determine the above grounds. These factors are: –
Earnestness of the offense committed
How strong is the grounds?
Previous Convictions
Background of the suspect
Whether the suspect has breached bond demands in the yesteryear
Whether there are any outstanding sentences
Whether the suspect has committed other offenses
If the suspect is refused bond, he or she may wish to use once more in the 2nd tribunal hearing. An entreaty can besides be made to the Crown Court Judge.
Beginnings of Information/References

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!


We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read