Grant Proposal Questions Essay

Published: 2020-05-06 09:24:09
980 words
4 pages
printer Print
essay essay

Category: History

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

GET MY ESSAY
To be a competent grant author and judge is non an easy undertaking. Grant proposal composing and rating requires extended cognition of proficient authorship and rating techniques. every bit good as sufficient practical experience. Here. literature and on-line resources offer significant sum of information. which could be used to better one’s grant proposal composing accomplishments. I believe that I should chiefly develop more realistic outlooks refering the sum ( the amount ) of money I am willing to bespeak.
It should be noted. that unrealistic outlooks are listed among the major errors authors tend to do. when composing grant proposals ( Timmons. 2005 ) . I besides think that better proficient authorship accomplishments will surely better the quality of my grant proposal composing. In footings of grant proposal rating. balanced attitudes toward rating methodological analysis should go the critical constituent of my successful public presentation as a grant proposal judge.
Beyond the fact that grant proposals are normally scored by some method ( Porter-Roth. 1999 ) . there is a whole set of nonsubjective and subjective factors that need to be taken into history. when grant proposals are being evaluated. I am confident that a well-balanced combination of subjective and nonsubjective standards will assist me go a professional grant proposal judge. These standards will besides assist my squad to develop nonsubjective and indifferent proposal rating techniques. and to ease the procedure of communicating and interaction with sellers. 2.
How has your rating of your proposal changed after reading How to Measure a Proposal through a Funder’s Eyes? ” The text How to Measure a Proposal through a Funder’s Eyes is utile in a sense that it provides a critique sheet that can be used to measure and mensurate the effectivity and relevancy of the grant proposal ( Carlson. 2002 ) . After reading the text. I had to reexamine all major constituents of my grant proposal. First of all. I had to measure the needs constituent of my grant proposal work. I had to guarantee that my demands assessment constituent provided sufficient information with respect to the job.
I think that I have been able to optimise my demands constituent without overloading it with statistical information. Second. I had to reconsider the relevancy of the ends and aims subdivision of the grant proposal. I must acknowledge that beyond the demand to diminish the unwellnesss and decease rates by 20 % . my ends and aims lacked quantifiability. As a consequence. I had to revise my ends and aims component to clear up. what goals I wanted to accomplish by carry throughing the major undertaking undertakings. Staffing. timelines. and the budget constituent – all these have become the built-in elements of my grant proposal.
Funders require full information about the methods. which I will utilize to accomplish my aims ; as a consequence. I had to be every bit detailed as possible in footings of the grant proposal methods. Evaluation constituent has besides been written in conformity with grant proposal composing demands. Although I was seeking to supply comprehensive undertaking information without overloading it with unneeded inside informations. I still believe that future funders will utilize a whole set of subjective standards to judge the quality and the relevancy of my undertaking ( Carlson. 2002 ) .
These standards are hard to foretell ; Internet and library resources provide scarce information about the subjective standards. which funders may utilize when measuring grant proposals. Thus. I do non believe we will of all time be able to measure grant proposals through possible funders’ eyes. 3. What accomplishment did you larn during the grant proposal development procedure that will be utile to you in the hereafter? How and why? The critical accomplishment I have learnt during the grant proposal development procedure is equilibrating undertaking needs with budget restraints.
In the procedure of finishing the undertaking. I had to be sensible in my budget petitions ; at the same time. I had to guarantee that my budget would non forestall undertaking participants from accomplishing strategic aims and awaited results. Trying to better the quality of my grant proposal composing. I was easy larning to inquire inquiries. Each grant proposal constituent had to be evaluated through the possible funders’ eyes. I had to larn to look at the quality. lucidity. brevity and proficient authorship characteristics from several different positions.
I have realized that writing a proposal requires understanding of demands. clip and resources on the portion of the seller. The usage of these resources is weighed against the chance of acquiring the job” ( Porter-Roth. 1999 ) . As a consequence. I had to inquire inquiries to guarantee that I had non omitted indispensable information. I had to inquire inquiries to do certain that I had sufficient resources to win the grant. I had to inquire inquiries to be confident that all demands toward grant proposal composing had been followed.
Finally. I had to inquire inquiries to avoid the major grant proposal composing errors. and to be able to present indispensable undertaking information in a brief and compendious mode. I have learnt to measure the quality and effectivity of a grant proposal non through the prism of its separate constituents. but as a whole merchandise. A grant proposal is ever the consequence of a difficult work. It requires understanding legion issues and topics sing the undertaking chances and demands.
Grant proposals should be written in ways. which create a harmonic image of demands. available resources. and project results ; and to accomplish these ends. any undertaking proposal should be evaluated as a whole image. with separate elements used to determine and heighten its positive image in the funders’ eyes. References Carlson. M. ( 2002 ) . Wining grants measure by measure. Jossey-Bass. Porter-Roth. B. ( 1999 ) . Guidelines for proposal rating. Document World. 4 ( 2 ) : 20-24. Timmons. L. A. ( 2005 ) . Biggest errors of Arizona grantseekers? Just Grants Arizona.

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!

GET UNIQUE ESSAY

We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read