Justification For Colonizing Latin America History Essay

Published: 2020-07-07 00:36:06
3458 words
13 pages
printer Print
essay essay

Category: History

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

GET MY ESSAY
Education or the deficiency of it has ever played an of import function in the full procedure of colonisation. And by instruction I mean the construct as perceived in the West. In fact the construct of instruction that we understand and employ today is besides defined, perceived and studied from a European point of position. Education has ever been used by the great European powers as a tool of colonisation and evangelization.
Although Education is a term unfastened to legion readings and every individual can hold his or her ain valid definition of this term ; in general this construct itself has been manipulated by the ‘educated ‘ in such a manner, that it includes the narrow standards of western book and books, wholly ignoring the full cognition and patterns of nature that a race/group of people can hold as a consequence of centuries of experience and witting contemplation.
The same took topographic point in Latin America. When Columbus foremost set his pes on the virgin land of Latin America, he clearly saw how lucratively he could work the copiousness of nature ‘s premium and the inexperienced person and powerless human resource. It is ironical so that the ‘educated ‘ batch did non desire to even see the issue of natural homo rights which were being violated when the procedure of colonisation began. Although the construct of instruction in itself is a baronial one, it has ever been used for personal boodle. The Europeans went to Latin America under the guiltless attire of evangelising and in bend educating it, but ended up in declining the basic human rights of which they were considered to be Pioneers. They really handily ended up naming the autochthonal people as ‘the other ‘ as they did non conform with the European idea and civilization. This other was non merely a manner of foregrounding the difference between the two races but was used in a dyslogistic sense as if the autochthonal people did n’t non possess the qualities to be considered human existences even. This guess was bolstered by of import minds like Hegel, Marx, Max Mueller etc. every bit good in the colonial period. What is more pathetic is that our ain perceptual experience of instruction besides is mostly formed under the microscope of western lexicons like the Oxford, Cambridge etc. The inquiry is that how can the same theory be applied to Latin America when even the continent itself is non a homogeneous mass and when there exists the same grade of difference between Uruguay and Nicaragua as between Korea and Sweden.
1.2 Civilization versus Barbarity.
The Spanish ever justified their colonisation under the principle that the Latin American Indians were a barbarian race, so the civilised Europeans had the moral duty of colonising them and incorporating them into the Christian religion. But the sarcasm is that they did it after destructing the rich civilization and civilisation of the Mayans, Incans, Aztecs and many other groups. The job in this context is the general inclination of philosophers like Hegel in specifying those features as universal which in fact are really civilization particular. This thought comes as a justification of working the autochthonal people under the spurious logic of making it as an of import measure in the procedure of development of a certain group of people who are still under beds of atrocity, ignorance and deficiency of education.. I think that colonisation finally becomes a commercial procedure with net income as its lone aim, which is why the colonisers participated so actively in this procedure. Spain besides maintained the same ambivalent attitude towards the Latin American Indians. Many Spanish young person, particularly those who did n’t inherit any belongings in Spain went to Latin America as feudal system was already deriving land at that place and labour was available freely.
1.3 Inconformity with the European rating of civilisation
The Spanish merely like the other Europeans applied the same Greco-Latin theories to measure the degree of civilisation of the American Indians wholly disregarding the cardinal difference in their civilizations and general cognition of the two races. The aboriginal job of Euro-centrism in Latin America was homogenising an country with a so much of cultural, racial and historical diverseness. For case, the Spanish called the Indians beastly because they practiced cannibalism. But this is gross generalisation of the whole state of affairs because the more known groups like the Mayans, Incans or the Aztecs did non pattern. Merely a few minorities followed this usage, that excessively non on a regular footing. Therefore warranting force against Indians merely because they are beastly harmonizing to the European manner of life, is non merely non sensible but beastly in itself excessively. Although the Spanish clerisy did transport out arguments about colonisation, the issue ne’er was whether or non to colonise Latin America, but about the most appropriate manner to make it. An of import illustration in this instance is the celebrated Valladolid Debate of 1550 between Juan Gines de Sepulveda and Fray Bartolome de las Casas. Colonization unluckily has ever been seen as something natural and inevitable for development.
The statistics about show that the autochthonal population which was around 80 % of the entire population in the eighteenth century, ended up being merely 46 % in the station independency period. The inquiry is how can the Europeans be called civilized when they took resort to the easiest solution of kill offing a race whose civilization was foreign and non worthy of contemplation to them. They ended up killing the people, the civilization, the tradition which they did non desire to understand and the people whom they did non see worlds. Sing the unfairness and dictatorship that the Spanish inflicted on a inactive and placid race, the truth demands that the definition of civilisation and atrocity be inverted.
1.4 The error of naming the American Indians as savages.
The Europeans called the autochthonal groups as savages for their ain convenience and to profit from the natural wealth of the continent. But there are groundss of model manner of life of the autochthonal groups in the Pre-columbian period, which can merely be categorized under the rubric of culmination of civilisation if studied objectively. The Mayans, a folk from the Maya-quiche group of linguistic communications developed a really interesting civilization around 1000 B.C. Around 750 A.D, they already had constructed expansive and good planned metropoliss, had a numerological system, an exact calendar and hieroglyphic book which was later partially converted in a phonic system. Furthermore they had a modern and daring architecture. The faith that the Mayans followed was similar in more ways than one to Christianity. There was no human forfeit in this faith till it was introduced by the Toltec around the twelfth century A.D. The Mayans lived in spread groups when the Spanish arrived in Latin America, that is why they ended up subjecting themselves to them but they ever safeguarded the memories of Mayan magnificence.
The Incas from Peru besides were a really developed race. Their instruction system was really advanced and practical. It stressed on larning through games which were really occupational in nature. The Incan ground forces had professors or Amautas, who persuaded the dwellers to give up to the Incan imperium. Thankss to them that the Incans expanded their district through logical convincing instead than conflicts and bloodshed. They had an advanced web of communicating run by couriers. They developed a really advanced manner of architecture The people in northern zone created such intense and complex signifier of art, which is known to us today as surrealist.
The Chibchu folk, followed a usage where the adult female of the house could give six ciliums to her delinquent hubby. This sort of right and regard for adult females was impossible to hold existed in the patriarchal European society.
Sing these features of the above mentioned races, I think, they can non be called barbarian even in today ‘s more advanced and modern times. A alone characteristic common to all these races was their fatalist belief that a human being has no power in the existence and all that occurs is the executing of God himself, this is how they submitted so passively to the Spanish without much opposition.
2. The state of affairs in the post-independence period.
Although Latin American states gained independency around 19th century, the procedure of state formation was democratic. Even though these states are independent today, the laterality of western inclinations is still seeable. The Indians, really few that still be, still do non hold the same societal position as the Creoles who dominate all the sectors of society like economic system and political relations. The ‘nation province ‘ is independent but the state is still ruled by European idea.
This is reflected in the plants of writers and politicians like Domingo Sarmiento, Manuel Gonzalez Prada and besides Jose Hernandez who although was the innovator of the gaucho genre refused the same rights to the autochthonal Indians flinging them as an unprocessed, illiterate race.
2.1 Sarmiento and ‘Facundo: Civilization and Barbarism ‘
In his work Facundo, Sarmiento criticizes the atrocity of the dictator Juan Manuel Rosas, the gaucho. He begins with the description of the argentine topography which determines and forms the character of the argentine cowpuncher ( gaucho ) and besides foreground how the huge sweep of the state has been an obstruction for the development of Argentina as it makes communicating really hard. He blames the gauchos for the same as harmonizing to him they are a great hindrance to come on because of their indolence, deficiency of aspiration and instruction. Sarmiento about compares them with wild animate beings who act harmonizing to their inherent aptitudes more than their intellectual powers. For Sarmiento, the lone manner to accomplish advancement in Argentina is doing the gauchos work and following the European and North American theoretical accounts of instruction and societal construction. In the full procedure he does non even take into consideration the issue of the autochthonal people and proposes to kill off their full race. I think it ‘s a hypocritical point of position to suggest to educate and develop a state on one manus and kill off an full public on the other.
2.2 Jose Hernandez and the Gaucho Literature.
Jose Hernandez in his book ‘El Gaucho Martin Fierro ‘ for the really first clip represents the voice of the Gaucho, who did non hold any sentiment before and was ever considered as an prototype of brutality, particularly by Sarmiento. But it is ironical that in this work, Hernandez speaks for the gauchos but on the other manus criticizes the Autochthonal people as savages. So finally there is non much difference in the vision of Sarmiento and Hernandez. Both of them blame the other. Sarmiento criticizes the Gauchos in favour of the Europeans while Hernandez criticizes the Indians in favour of the gauchos. There is an illustration that better illustrates Hernandez ‘s point of position ;
The Indian clings to his atrocity ;
Do n’t trust to alter him.
To wish to do himself better,
Does n’t travel with his unsmooth ways.
The barbaric merely know
How to acquire intoxicated and battle. ” ( Alba, Victor, THE LATIN AMERICANS )
2.3 Gonzalez Prada and ‘Discurso en EL politeama
Although some alteration is observed in the perceptual experience of the autochthonal towards 19th century, it is non sufficient. Gonzalez Prada, in his essay, ‘Discurso en el Politeama ‘ negotiations extensively about the demand of genuinely integrating them in the mainstream society but he excessively has a really arch attitude in this respect. He emphasis the importance of instruction when speaking about development and advancement of the Indians. Prada is willing to integrate Indians in the Latin American Society but merely after they take instruction. Once once more the European influence is seen in Prada ‘s thought as he can readily accepts anything European as cosmopolitan and natural without even believing if its at par with the Latin American Sensibility.
2.4 The gradual change in Latin American Thought in favour of Nationalism.
A positive alteration is observed in the idea of authors like Jose Marti and Jose Mariategui who emphasized the other countries in the hindrance of Latin American Development instead than faulting the Indians.
Jose Marti for illustration negotiations extensively of the importance of instruction in his essay, Nuestra America ( Our America ) . But his construct of instruction is much more practical and balanced. Marti negotiations of contriving new systems and new solutions particularly for the Latin American jobs and advises against blindly copying the European states.
.Marti along with Gonzalez Prada hopes that the young person participates actively in state formation which has been under beds of unfairness and degeneracy for many old ages. He makes the young person in charge of this duty and encourages immature heads to cognize the roots of their state, its civilization, people and history, and analyze this on their ain alternatively of sing every thing that is European to be the supreme truth.
In the same manner a different manner of thought is observed in the plants of Jose Mariategui who identifies feudal system as the root of all the Latin American jobs. In his essay, ‘The job of the Indian ‘ Mariategui attacks the European point of position which merely considers conventional factors and theories like instruction in the European context or better said, the deficiency of European instruction as jobs and points out the necessity of including all the practical factors like economic and societal construction in the construct of teaching method. He focuses on the demand to alter the societal construction for a balanced development that would concentrate on kill offing the frailties and non the races.
In short Marti and Mariategui oppose the European vision of analysing and work outing jobs instead than merely faulting the Indians and non giving them any opportunity for advancement and development. Subconsciously they oppose all the misguided constructs of Euro moderatism which is ever considered to be natural and true merely because the Europeans have had the capacity of jointing and showing themselves.
3. Euro moderatism and Homogenization of Latin America:
Another of import facet that can be identified as the job of Latin Ameica is that it has ever been considered as a homogeneous continent which intensifies the job. First the Europeans have manipulated everything in such a manner that this continent and its dwellers have been considered as savages without any cognition of latest engineering or without ground or logic. Second the Europeans on their ain have assumed the duty of educating them without even believing if they truly did necessitate to alter. They have ever considered everything European to be perfect without any jobs, but the existent issue is, what is right in the European context may non be so in other instances. There is excessively much of difference in the history, civilization, clime, lifestyles etc. of the two continents. Furthermore, the history of which we partake is barely of all time nonsubjective. Although we form our sentiments based on historic facts, the truth is that history is a comparative affair. History ever favors one race or people which automatically criticizes some other race. But thanks to the attempts of historiographers and minds of the nineteenth century who at least attempt to analyze and analyze historic facts in the most nonsubjective manner possible. This gives us an chance of crosschecking history, cognizing different position points and so organize our ain sentiments.
These new currents of objectivism have made the universe take notice of the autochthonal voice and demand the whole truth. Thankss to these attempts that people have begun to oppugn the euro-centric vision and besides see what the Indians have to state.
4. Decision and personal sentiment
Taking into history all the above mentioned factors and the socio-cultural and political view of Latin America, it is certain than Latin America can non be homogenized as it is an vastly big country. Furthermore one can non use the same theories and solutions to Latin American jobs as Europe and Latin America barely have anything in common. Its of import to look into the civilization, history and societal life of Latin America to understand its existent kernel and individuality. This is the lone manner of making justness to people who have been victims of the Spanish colonisation and still endure the after effects in malice of their independency. But the inquiry is, where is this autochthonal population, in this full procedure of state formation. Cipher can hear its voice. In fact all the politicians have been so much influenced by the European thought that cipher even wants to wait a minute to contemplate the status of the autochthonal people: the original dwellers of Latin America who have lost their land and their individuality everlastingly. If this vision is non changed, shortly there will be a twenty-four hours when the autochthonal people, their civilization and history will merely be in the history, without any hints of their individuality. Thankss to the attempts of authors like Jose Marti who emphasize the demand of looking within a state to happen solutions instead than looking at Europe or Latin America. These new minds have a much balanced vision and they recognize the importance of instruction in state formation and development, but they do non take resort to extreme steps like Sarmiento and others who recognize the importance of instruction but wish to use the European system to Latin America. Marti emphasizes understanding and cognizing 1s ain civilization and experiencing the hurting of Latin America instead than depending on the seamster made European theoretical accounts which can non analyse and understand the hinderances and the true history of Latin America ‘s huge agonies. This is because history besides is written by the most privileged people who know to pull strings the ideas and perceptual experiences of those who do non hold this module really good developed.
Another facet is that, under the Euro-centric vision the Europeans ever talked of the duality between Civilization and Barbarism, ever sing Europe to be the culmination of civilization and civilisation and the states that we identify today as 3rd universe states as supreme illustrations of brutality and deficiency of civility. But what fusss me most is, is it truly possible to analyse everything so subjectively. Because on critically analysing all these factors objectively, I find this to be a really hypocrite vision and division. The atrocity of the Indians has ever been perceived as an obstruction to advancement of Latin American states, but it has to be examined good if a state like Argentina which is about wholly barren of the autochthonal population is besides free of unfairness and offense. I think the constructs of instruction and civilisation are really comparative because something perceived as instruction by one race and civilization might be wholly useless and unlogical for some other. What is of import so is the clip and context. Hence a certain degree of tolerance towards other people, other civilizations and other life manners is a requirement. I can site a really appropriate soliloquy from the movie Chocolat which can be paraphrased as, ‘ a good faith or race is evaluated on the footing of what it embraces and includes instead than on the footing of what it exterminates and excludes. ‘
So what is most of import today is organizing new political orientations entirely for Latin America which would take into consideration its existent kernel. It is necessary to retrace the history that would give platform to the Latin American Voice and that would animate a reader through intelligent logic. Its necessary to redefine modernness and civilisation which would include more and have an ample range. I agree with what the great mind Enrique Dussel has said in this respect,
It is now clip to alter teguments and to see through new eyes.
It is now clip to set off the tegument and the eyes of the I conquer which
culminates in the self-importance cogito or the will-to-power.
One ‘s new custodies are non those that clutch Fe weaponries, and one ‘s new eyes are
non those looking out from the caravels of the European interlopers,
who cry Land! with Columbus.
The new tegument is the soft, suntanned tegument of Caribbeans, of the Andean people, of the Amazonians ( aˆ¦ . ) ( Dussel Enrique, The Invention Of the Americas. )
Reasoning it all, I can state that Latin America is ever seen through the European parametric quantities ignoring the distinguishable individuality of Latin America. Now it is perfectly important to contrive and make new states based entirely on Latin American rules and non on the European classics. twenty-first century calls for a new vision anchored in the roots of existent civilizations and imposts. Although this will take a long clip to come into consequence, with the new minds and new modern policies, it will decidedly be seen through new vision which will be Latin America ‘s really ain.

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!

GET UNIQUE ESSAY

We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read