Shakespeare’s verbal, internal, and difference in views

Published: 2020-07-27 19:30:04
709 words
3 pages
printer Print
essay essay

Category: Music

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

Shakespeare’s portrayal of conflict is evident in a variety of ways. The audience’s perception of the emotional and physical conflict relies on the language of the characters, character actions, and contrasting scenes reflecting the contrasting conflicts. Moral, emotional, religious, social and inner conflict area all expressed and explored throughout the play, from the very first scene. In this play there are four main types of violence/conflict: physical, verbal, internal, and difference in views or perspective.
Romeo and Juliet begins with the Prologue, a speech – or ‘chorus’ – made by an actor before the main play begins. The Prologue foreshadows the events in the play, such as the deaths of Romeo and Juliet and tells the audience what the play will be about. Shakespeare uses the structure of the prologue to express the theme of love and conflict which occurs throughout the play. It is written in the sonnet form and is fourteen lines long with Iambic pentameter.When the Prologue mentions how the feud between the two houses (families), From ancient grudge break to new mutiny/Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean” Shakespeare shows how violence and bloody conflict has affected the whole of Verona, whack in the 1500s, it would have. Like Mercutio, one of Shakespeare’s best friends died, in a street brawl. Deaths caused by sword fights were quite common at that time.
A 16th century audience would have liked Romeo and Juliet” because it is quick to jump into action as can be seen in the first scene of the play which opens with a fight in a public place in Verona between servants from the Montague and Capulet households. This starts by Sampson and Gregory – servants of the house of Capulet – going out with the intention of creating trouble. They soon find that they are in luck, as they see Abraham and Balthasar – servants of the house of Montague. When they see the opportunity of a fight, they immediately/ straight away start provoking each other. Sampson says to Gregory, Quarrel, I will back thee” what he is saying is that he will back Gregory up, but at the same time is hinting that he does not want to be the one to start the fighting and wants Gregory to go first. The conflict starts off as verbal and would have ended up as physical had Benvolio not stepped in and separated the servants.
In Act I, scene 5 when Tybalt overhears Romeo talking with Juliet, he is angered by the fact that a Montague had gate crashed the ball at the Capulet household and sends for his ‘rapier’. He also informs Capulet of Romeo’s presence and puts in his utmost efforts in convincing that Romeo and his gang should be thrown out, but despite his convincing words, Capulet rebukes him, addressing him as ‘boy’ – which is an insult as it is normally used only for servants – and tells Tybalt to leave him alone. He explains that Romeo is ‘virtuous and well-governed.’ However, Tybalt refuses to leave and Capulet reprimands him, calling him a ‘saucy boy.’ Tybalt’s only choice is to leave.
In Act III, scene 1, Mercutio uses wordplay in his response to Tybalt’s statement that Mercutio ‘consortest’ with Romeo. Mercutio uses a series of puns about music, such as ‘minstrels’ (a group of musicians) and ‘discord’ (a group of notes). Shakespeare cleverly uses both figurative language and word play when Mercutio says: Here’s my fiddlestick, here’s that shall make you dance”. In the sixteenth century the meaning of ‘fiddlestick’ was the bow of a fiddle. Mercutio’s choice of the word ‘fiddlestick’ is a clever play on words, as he jokes that his sword/fiddlestick will make Tybalt dance. It is clear that there is conflict between Mercutio and Tybalt, and due to Mercutio’s insulting remarks and provocative comments, in the very same episode, Tybalt kills Mercutio. In this scene both Mercutio and Tybalt die and this begins a darker side to the play, transforming it from a Romance or Comedy into a Tragedy with violent ends for both households . Act III, scene 1 is therefore a fundamental turning point in the play, ultimately leading to the deaths of several main characters, most notably the two young lovers, Romeo and Juliet

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!


We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read