Different stakeholders have difference motive and docket towards doctorial grade programme. These stakeholders are the pupils, establishments and patrons. Students pursue doctorial grade may ensue from the desire to lend to academic community, personal development, calling in academic, employment chances or increased in wage. Institutions are pressured to bring forth high quality research undertaking in order to heighten their image ( Ismail et al. 2011 ) and reaction to economic drivers ( Lee 2013 ) . Universities discovered that with more doctorate pupils, it is more likely universities can bring forth more research end product. For patron, the thrusts toward funding doctorial programme are to develop rational capital, economic regeneration, and protecting and developing the quality of cognition ( Lee 2013 ) . Further, research workers found that workplaces require a extremely skilled work force with technological accomplishments, applied cognition and the competence to lend to the cognition economic system ( Walker & A ; Thomson 2010 ; McCallin & A ; Nayar 2012 )
As identified in Section 1.4, the common issues that PhD research pupils brush are isolation, clip direction and supervising ( Hockey 1994 ) . Students feel stray during different phases of their surveies, being confronted with administrative and research procedure. The footing for isolation revolves around three issues: deficiency of communications, miscommunication, and confusion ( Ali & A ; Kohun 2006 ) . To supervise and pull off the quality confidence of graduate student procedure could be dearly-won in footings of clip and confusing among the decision makers, supervisors and the pupils. Further, issue related to supervising is the most repeatedly given grounds for non-completion of PhDs in the UK ( Haksever & A ; Manisali 2000 ) .
The Research Assessment Exercise ( RAE ) aˆ?The research evaluation of a section or school is known as its RAE evaluation. Most sections will print their RAE mark on their web sites or you can see the consequences of the whole RAE on the RAE web site. The RAE takes topographic point one time or twice in a decennary and the latest RAE for which consequences are published is from 2008. The consequences can be difficult to construe and each university may take to expose them in a different visible radiation. Any section or school with 50 % or more of their staff rated 4* or 3* is making really good for itself and analyzing at that place will do you look good. It does non nevertheless mean that every research group in that section is at the top of their game. Universities have a grade of flexibleness in how they are assessed for the RAE. They sometimes group departments together, so if they ‘ve got two outstanding life scientific discipline sections and one non so good one they may subject all three as one unit, concealing the bad section. They can, and do, take non to subject some of their faculty members for inclusion in the appraisal ( sometimes because they are immature and have n’t had clip to construct up a publication record or sometimes because they ‘re non really good ) . The ground they go to so much attempt is that a big sum of support for the five old ages following the RAE is based on the consequence.
Social and Intellectual Isolationaˆ?
Doctoral pupil rational isolation is described as holding small in common with others in the pupil section, deficiency of rational stimulation and exchange of thoughts with equals or supervisors, non understanding that the passage to being an independent bookman is portion and package of the doctorial educational procedure, and distance acquisition or part-time. Lee ( 2007 ) stated that isolation may change in strength across subjects, cohorts, for full or portion clip pupils and for those making distance acquisition, but the nature of the programme for current traditional Ph.d. pupils mean that they are still likely to be present in some signifier. Isolation issues will do doctorial pupil ‘s abrasion, dampen initial enthusiasm, hinders advancement and leads to loss of involvement.
Ali & A ; Kohun ( 2006 ) claimed in the US that approximately 50 per cent of pupils started and stop up dropping out which is about around 40,000 yearly. Terrell et Al. ( 2009 ) and Lovitts ( 2005 ) reported the breakdown causes of the abrasion are:
50 per cent for academic grounds, such as failure, deficiency of integrating into the plan, isolation, job with or loss of their adviser, loss of involvement or dissatisfaction with the plan ;
20 per cent for personal grounds such as unwellness, hurt, deficiency of motive, household or relationship issues ;
20 per cent for fiscal issues ; and
10 per cent for other assorted grounds.
Reported by HEFCE ( 2010 ) , the PhD completion rates in UK revealed that for full-time place and European Union pupils get downing their programme in 2002-03, a sum of 80 per cent and 74 per cent of abroad pupils qualified within seven old ages.
For parttime and mode-switch place and European Union pupils get downing their programme in 1999-2000, a sum of 53 per cent and 59 per cent of abroad pupils qualified within 10 old ages.
However, through analysis of Universities, some of them fall short in presenting the consequences ( The Times, 2010 ) . Liverpool John Moores ‘ University came worst for full-time place and European Union pupils for the category of 2001-02, merely 34 per cent of whom qualified within seven old ages and merely 10 per cent of full-time abroad pupils recruited that twelvemonth qualified. Table 1 Best Performer Universities and Table 1 Worst Performer Universities show the best and worst performing artists for doctorial making rates for full-time place and European Union pupils measure uping within seven old ages ( get downing in 2002-03 ) .
Table 1 Best Performer Universities
Best Performers Universities
Imperial College London
University of Bristol
University of Nottingham
University of Cambridge
University of Liverpool
University of York
Beginning: The Times ( 2010 )
Table 1 Worst Performer Universities
Worst Performers Universities
University of Bedfordshire
University of Derby
Liverpool John Moores University
Manchester Metropolitan University
University of Salford
Beginning: The Times ( 2010 )
The making rates are associated with: manner of survey ( full-time or parttime ) , domicile, capable, beginning of pupil support, age, making on entry and ethnicity ( HEFCE, 2010 ) .
Having a Code of Practice for confidence of academic quality and criterions in higher instruction with the purposes to supply counsel on keeping the quality and criterions for universities and colleges ( QAA, 2010 ) , does non look to accomplish its program for the worst performing artist universities.
A recent research grade making rates were published by HEFCE ( 2012 ) that presents projected rates of making for pupils on graduate student research grade. The study indicates about two tierce of the 10,140 pupils who started research grades in English higher instruction establishments in 2009-10 are projected to measure up within seven old ages, and around three-fourthss will measure up over a longer period. Table 1 Qualified with research grade shows per centum of pupils qualified with research grade award within 7 old ages or above for 2009-10 cohorts.
Table 1 Qualified with research grade
Full-time research grade
Qualified with research grade award ( % )
Year of survey 1
Year of survey 2
Year of survey 3
Year of survey 4
Year of survey 5
Year of survey 6
Year of survey 7 or above
Beginning: HEFCE ( 2012 )
Most universities and patrons offer their PhD campaigners for three old ages full-time. However, the tabular array above show merely 2.2 % qualifies in the 3rd twelvemonth with research grade award. Majority of pupils with 42.3 % qualifies in the 5th twelvemonth of their survey therefore burthening pupils with fiscal issues and clip. Allocation of research support from funding council adopted policy to punish non entry after 4 yearsaˆ¦aˆ¦ .
Terrell et Al. ( 2009 ) developed a study instrument on Doctoral Student Connectedness Scale, which is designed to place pupils at hazard of dropout. The findings claimed that pupils experience less so desirable degrees of connection between each other and faculty members. As a consequence, there was a demand for intercessions initiated by decision makers, module, and pupils. Examples given by the writers, include: providing face-to-face and on-line workshops that focus on assorted facets of the thesis, delegating module wise mans or advisers in the PhD plan, set uping module and pupil cohorts based on specific involvements and research dockets, and utilizing on-line communicating tools to ease student-to-student and student-to-faculty interaction. Coupled with these activities, student-led enterprises, such as the development of community of pattern that are supported by disposal and module, are besides recommended for on-line doctorial pupils.
A model for covering with societal isolation at doctorial plans was introduced by Ali and Kohun ( 2006 ) in order to minimise doctorial abrasion. The writers applied Beeler ‘s theoretical account ( Beeler, 1991 cited by Ali and Kohun, 2006 ) to reflect the accommodation of doctorial pupils to academic life, it is normally a procedure that takes witting and unconscious transmutation that is summarised as Table 1 Beeler ‘s theoretical account to reflect the accommodation of doctorial pupils to academic life..
Table 1 Beeler ‘s theoretical account to reflect the accommodation of doctorial pupils to academic life.
Causes of Isolation
Redresss of Social Isolation
Preadmission to enrolment
Lack of societal integrating
Insufficient administrative support
Formal societal and introduction events
Difference with other academic programmes
New societal accommodation
Second twelvemonth through campaigning
Lack of readiness for comprehensive test
Lack of usher to choose research subject
Lack of usher to choose an adviser
Collaborative theoretical account
Topic Presentation/ feedback
Structure usher for adviser choice
Unstructured thesis stage
Structure for the thesis phases
Note: This theoretical account is based on US doctorial programme phases. The term adviser is tantamount to supervisor in the UK.
Most doctorial programmes do non necessitate pupils to take formal categories or talks. Alternatively, doctorial pupils start straight with the research and the thesis phase.
Existing customised information systems and powerful web societal web systems have been developed to help research workers to pass on, collaborate, web and portion information. One of these platforms is known as Virtual Research Environment ( VRE ) . This system helps research workers manage research complexness by supplying an substructure specifically designed to back up the activities carried out within research squads, on both little and big graduated tables ( Allan et al. 2004 ) . It is designed to back up research workers in general but non specifically designed to back up PhD research procedure.
The completion of a PhD is a long and strenuous procedure that takes at least three old ages. Hockey ( 1994 ) claimed that the first twelvemonth is possibly the most important period, where pupils will meet and see rational and societal procedures at their point of upper limit freshness, and in bend, possible trouble.
More than two-thirds of research pupils agree that they were confident about finishing on agenda, and that proportion has increased somewhat each twelvemonth ( The Higher Education Academy, 2009 ) .
An issue associating to this subject is that doctorial pupils were unable to be more specific on their undertakings, and rapidly detect that before they can continue, several preliminary stairss is needed to be taken, obscure overall programs, ends really fuzzy, unstructured attack to the undertaking ( Phillips and Pugh, 2000 ) .
The impact of this issue leads to:
Greater dependance on the supervisor for feedback refering pupil advancement ;
Measuring ain work would besides be more hard ;
Can non pull off to finish the jutting work in the clip assigned ; and
Redefinition of undertaking end.
Some solutions have been suggested by Phillips and Pugh ( 2000 ) through building the research programme in concurrence with the supervisor, to develop an overall clip program of the research phases, and to utilize the clip program to supervise advancement and therefore actuate the pupil to go on on class. This clip program will do it easier to redefine short-run ends, and doing usage of undertaking direction application package will enable the research worker to track and pull off their research programme.
Whalley ( 2011 ) presented a PhD thesis completion hazard chart ( Figure 1 PhD pupil patterned advance theoretical account ( adapted from Whalley, 2011 ) ) that categorised four groups of PhD pupils: victors, strugglers, surprises, and also-rans. The victors group complete their thesis within 3 old ages while the strugglers group complete it within 4 old ages. For the surprises group they complete it within 5 old ages and the also-rans ne’er complete their thesis.
PhD Progression Model 1.tif
Figure 1 PhD pupil patterned advance theoretical account ( adapted from Whalley, 2011 )
A study that provides national consequences from the Postgraduate Experience Surveys ( PRES ) represent the positions of graduate student researches for aiming, planing and measuring work in order to heighten larning experience of graduate student pupils ( Hodsdon & A ; Buckley 2011 ) . PRES 2011 was the 4th rhythm of the study conducted, in which, old study was ran in 2007, 2008 and 2009. The national response rate was 32 % with 31,202 pupils finishing the study from 102 UK establishments.
PRES 2011 consequences shows that the overall satisfaction degrees for UK research pupils are progressively positive, 86 % of respondents saying the overall experience of their programme met or transcend their outlook compared with 81 % in 2007, 83 % in 2008 and 84 % in 2009. Supervision graduated table had the strongest impact on how research pupils rated their overall experience, followed by the Intellectual Climate graduated table, and the Professional Development and Career graduated table. However, it was found that a fifth of the respondents thought supervising did non run into outlooks that concerned counsel with literature hunts.
Ives and Rowley ( 2005 ) indicated that communications and positive relationship between supervisor and pupil are the key for successful PhD awards. The most repeatedly given grounds for non-completion of PhDs in the UK over a figure of surveies were jobs associated with supervising ( Bourke et al. 2004 ; Haksever & A ; Manisali 2000 )
Positive interpersonal relationships were associated with good advancement and pupil satisfaction. As reported by Denicolo ( 2004 ) , positive properties of supervisors amongst others are:
Assurance in the pupil ;
Informative ; and
Mainhard et Al. ( 2009 ) added that the supervisor should hold listening accomplishments, promote statement and argument, provide uninterrupted feedback and support, enthusiastic, and demo heat and apprehension. Seagram et Al. ( 1998 ) showed that of import positive features of supervisors harmonizing to their doctorial pupils were professionalism, and supportive behavior.
On negative interpersonal relationship, Mainhard et Al. ( 2009 ) reported that they might emerge through:
Tension bing between the supportive assisting function of the supervisor and the demands of the function to justify thesis quality ;
Supervisory manner that is disposed for a peculiar pupil can be at odds with the preferable manner of the supervisor, or the manner either he or she is competent to supply ; and
Unaware of the development of the supervisory relationship, both at the portion of the supervisor and the pupil, this may lend a major menace for the development of supervisory way into a productive way.
Mainhard et Al. ( 2009 ) proposed QSDI ( questionnaire on supervisor-doctoral pupil interaction ) as a dependable instrument to garner informations about doctorial pupils ‘ perceptual experiences of their supervisor ‘s interpersonal manner. And it can besides assist to measure intercessions to better supervisory relationships. This instrument maps the relationship between a doctorial pupil and his or her supervisor from the position of the pupil. The writers farther suggested future research to complement this position with supervisor ‘s perceptual experience of the pupil manner.
Parry and Hayden ( 1994 cited by Kiley 2003 ) proposed 13 rules for successful higher grade by research supervising as follows:
Enrolling and selecting pupils ;
Allocating supervisors ;
Supplying guidelines ;
Choosing the subject ;
Giving advice on how to make research ;
Meeting with pupil ;
Helping pupils to compose ;
Keeping a on the job relationship ;
Checking procedure ;
Introducing pupils to scholarly webs ;
Guaranting acceptableness of the thesis ;
Choosing testers ; and
Supplying calling support.
Academic point of views on ‘What makes a good research pupil ‘s, were discussed by three faculty members: Professor Paul Chung, Doctor Danish J Malik, and Professor John Arnold ( Gilman 2010 ) . They outline the qualities of ideal research pupils, challenges and danger marks for new PhD pupils.
Qualities of ideal research pupil included:
Flexible with their ideas and planning ;
Tolerance for ambiguity ;
Hard working and open-minded to suggestions ;
Ability to measure existing work and coming out with their ain thoughts ;
Autonomous and good organised ;
Competent research accomplishments ; and
Seek uninterrupted preparation and active feedback from supervisors and others.
Challenges for new PhD pupils included:
A literature reappraisal can be a dashing undertaking in order to place spreads in the literature ;
Capable involvement may have on off after a period of clip. In order to get the better of this concern, pupils need to be resilient and retrieve their motivations for making PhD surveies, doing necessary attempts to acquire involved in the academic community ; and
Experiencing failure, solitariness, and ennui. Students need to equilibrate their work with other societal activities.
Danger marks for PhD pupils included:
Students that seek certainty from twenty-four hours one ;
Not focused on their thoughts ;
Rely on their supervisor for thoughts ;
Do non come on with their research work ; and
Have a difficult clip bring forthing relevant links and thoughts.
Model of Supervision
Systems Support for Research Process
This subdivision reviews the technological tools that are used to back up research procedure and activities. Madadnia et Al. ( 2001 ) proposed a collaborative partnership attack to Virtual Research Supervision. The system facilitates a shared apprehension of a undertaking, undertaking and procedure between supervisors and pupils. While regular feedback from equals and supervisors to ease through shared online forum, whereby pupils can see the feedback given to others and take part in the procedure.
De Rezende et Al. ( 2006 ) developed a work flow system for back uping student-supervisor Scientific Collaboration. It was designed to back up cognition direction and coaction. Their work is limited towards back uping thesis development application. It does non provide for wider research procedure. Merwe et Al. ( 2005 ) proposed a generic educational theoretical account construction for HEI. However, the proposed theoretical account is excessively generic to back up the diversenesss of research procedure and activities.
Postgraduate Research Process Main Elements ( Activities )
In order to back up the whole graduate student research procedure, this Thesis undertook the initial component ( activities ) that is coaction. The coaction component entails pupils to pass on easy with equals, supervisors and the remainder of research communities. This will heighten rational stimulation and exchange of thoughts with equals or supervisors.
The 2nd component of this survey is covering with disposal. This component performs administrative support to supervise and pull off the quality confidence of PhD procedure that can be dearly-won in footings of clip and confusing among the decision makers, supervisors, and the pupils.
It is indispensable to put the 3rd elements of this survey that is patterned advance. Progression component advices pupil ‘s in their research advancement. It provides a clear research program between students-supervisors outlook and deliverables and completion hazard issues.
And the 4th component of this survey is the supervising. The supervising component enables interaction through information and papers sharing activities in the student-supervisor relationship that arises during the development of a PhD procedure. And it provides support in carry oning specific research activities.
Summary and decision
This chapter concludes that the common issues that PhD research pupils ‘ brushs are isolation, clip direction, and supervising. These issues are of concern to patrons, authorities, research councils, universities and the PhD pupils. Isolation causes doctorial pupil abrasion, dampens initial enthusiasm, hinders advancement and leads to loss of involvement. The most repeatedly given grounds for non-completion of PhDs in the UK over a figure of surveies were jobs associated with supervising.
The findings of PhD pupils ‘ issues and challenges proposed that work flow and service tools could back up PhD procedure. A holistic attack to back up PhD procedure is of import to guarantee the PhD pupils ‘ receive positive experience and quality confidence during their PhD surveies. There are four elements ( activities ) identified to back up postgraduate research procedure: Collaboration, Supervision, Progression, and Administration. These elements are the chief work flow activities to back up the graduate student research procedure. These elements besides help in planing the instance rating survey of this Thesis.
Ali, A. & A ; Kohun, F. , 2006. Covering with Isolation Feelings in IS Doctoral Programs. International Journal, 1.
Allan, R. et al. , 2004. Roadmap for a uk practical research environment. Report of the JISC JCSR VRE Working Group.
Bourke, S. et al. , 2004. ATTRITION, COMPLETION AND COMPLETION TIMES OF PhD CANDIDATES. Time.
Carter, S. et al. , 2011. The doctor’s degree of the Bologna Process 3rd rhythm: Maping the dimensions and impact of the European Higher Education Area. Journal of Research in International Education, 9 ( 3 ) , pp.245-258. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //jri.sagepub.com/content/9/3/245.abstract [ Accessed March 20, 2013 ] .
Denicolo, P. , 2004. Doctoral supervising of co-workers: skining off the veneer of satisfaction and competency. Surveies in Higher Education, 29 ( 6 ) , pp.693-707. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.informaworld.com/openurl? genre=article & A ; doi=10.1080/0307507042000287203 & A ; magic=crossref||D404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3 [ Accessed October 12, 2010 ] .
Gilman, J. , 2010. What makes a good research Student. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //learn.lboro.ac.uk/mod/podcast/media/3615/311/What_makes_ [ Accessed September 16, 2010 ] .
Haksever, a. M. & A ; Manisali, E. , 2000. Measuring supervising demands of PhD pupils: The instance of building direction and technology in the UK. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25 ( 1 ) , pp.19-32. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.informaworld.com/openurl? genre=article & A ; doi=10.1080/030437900308616 & A ; magic=crossref||D404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3.
HEFCE, 2012. Research degree making rates – HEFCE. Higher Education Funding Council For England. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/howfundr/researchdegreeprogrammes/researchdegreequalificationrates/ [ Accessed August 22, 2012 ] .
Hockey, J. , 1994. New district: Problems of seting to the first twelvemonth of a societal scientific discipline PhD. Studies in Higher Education, 19 ( 2 ) , pp.177-190. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.informaworld.com/openurl? genre=article & A ; doi=10.1080/03075079412331382027 & A ; magic=crossref||D404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3.
Hodsdon, D.L. & A ; Buckley, D.A. , 2011. Postgraduate Research Experience Survey ( PRES ) 2011. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/postgraduate/PRES_2011_report [ Accessed August 22, 2012 ] .
Ismail, A. , Abiddin, N. & A ; Hassan, A. , 2011. Bettering the development of Postgraduates ‘ research and supervising. International Education Studies, 4 ( 1 ) , pp.78-89. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ies/article/view/9100 [ Accessed March 20, 2013 ] .
Ives, G. & A ; Rowley, G. , 2005. Supervisor choice or allotment and continuity of supervising: Ph.D. pupils ‘ advancement and results. Surveies in Higher Education, 30 ( 5 ) , pp.535-555. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.informaworld.com/openurl? genre=article & A ; doi=10.1080/03075070500249161 & A ; magic=crossref||D404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3 [ Accessed October 12, 2010 ] .
Kiley, M. , 2003. Developments in postgraduate instruction in Australia over the last decennary. Quality.
Lee, A. , 2007. Developing effectual supervisorsaˆ? : Concepts of research supervising Developing effectual supervisorsaˆ? : Concepts of research supervising. South African Journal of Higher Education.
Lee, A. , 2013. New development: Are our doctorial programmes making what we think they are? Public Money & A ; Management, 33 ( 2 ) , pp.119-122. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2013.763423 [ Accessed March 12, 2013 ] .
Lovitts, B.E. , 2005. Bing a good courseaˆ?taker is non adequate: a theoretical position on the passage to independent research. Studies in Higher Education, 30 ( 2 ) , pp.137-154. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075070500043093 [ Accessed August 22, 2012 ] .
Madadnia, J. , Koosha, H. & A ; Mckenzie, J. , 2001. A collaborative partnership attack to practical research supervising. In Towards Excellence in Engineering Education: Proceedings of the 12th Australasian Conference on Engineering Education, 7th Australasian Women in Engineering Forum. p. 85.
Mainhard, T. et al. , 2009. A theoretical account for the supervisor-doctoral pupil relationship. Higher Education, 58 ( 3 ) , pp.359-373. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10734-009-9199-8 [ Accessed August 28, 2010 ] .
McCallin, A. & A ; Nayar, S. , 2012. Postgraduate research supervising: a critical reappraisal of current pattern. Teaching in Higher Education, 17 ( 1 ) , pp.63-74. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.590979 [ Accessed March 12, 2013 ] .
Merwe, A. Van der, 2009. Towards a reclaimable procedure theoretical account construction for higher instruction establishments. , ( June ) . Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/653 [ Accessed October 3, 2012 ] .
Parry, S. & A ; Hayden, M. , 1994. Oversing higher grade research pupils: An probe of patterns across a scope of academic sections, AGPS.
QAA, T.Q.A.A. for H.E. , 2011. The UK doctor’s degree: A usher for current and prospective doctorial campaigners. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Pages/Doctorate-guide.aspx [ Accessed March 20, 2013 ] .
De Rezende, J. et al. , 2006. Supporting Student-Supervisor Scientific Collaboration. 2006 tenth International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, pp.1-6. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm? arnumber=4019262.
Seagram, B.C. , Gould, J. & A ; Pyke, S.W. , 1998. AN Probe OF GENDER AND OTHER VARIABLES ON TIME TO COMPLETION OF DOCTORAL DEGREES. Social Science, 39 ( 3 ) .
Terrell, S.R. , Snyder, M.M. & A ; Dringus, L.P. , 2009. Internet and Higher Education The development, proof, and application of the Doctoral Student Connectedness Scale. The Internet and Higher Education, 12 ( 2 ) , pp.112-116. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.004.
Walker, M. & A ; Thomson, P. , 2010. The Routledge doctorial supervisor ‘s comrade: Supporting effectual research in instruction and the societal scientific disciplines, Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //books.google.co.uk/books? hl=en & A ; lr= & A ; id=RuHPnJbdGnsC & A ; oi=fnd & A ; pg=PP1 & A ; ots=iyd09n9lI_ & A ; sig=kZqVGFMij3wlQEW-KNfCxYGs9_A [ Accessed March 21, 2013 ] .
Whalley, D. , 2011. PhD Success Factors and School Progression Procedures. Wolfson School of Mechanical & A ; Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University.