Study On The Purpose Of Financial Analysis Finance Essay

Published: 2020-07-21 23:25:05
2543 words
9 pages
printer Print
essay essay

Category: Management

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

GET MY ESSAY
Fiscal analysis is the procedure by which companies or concerns large or little have a expression at their advancement. There are three facet of the concern which are examined this include viability, stableness and profitableness. Fiscal analysis could besides be called fiscal statement analysis.
Fiscal analysis study are prepared from ratios taken from the fiscal statement of the concern which the direction usage to move on the concern.
The purposes of the fiscal analysis are:
Profitableness: this is a both short-run and long term purpose to accomplish net income and prolong it.It can be calculated from the income statement.
Solvency: when the concern as to pay it creditors and in the long term.Can be calculated from the balance sheet.
Liquid: It aim is to hold stable hard currency flow at the same clip meeting it short term obligation.Also can be calculated from balance sheet.
Stability: procedure of remaining in concern in the long term and keep profit.It can be calculated from both in income statement and balance sheet and other fiscal and non fiscal indexs.
Fiscal analyst normally use three ways to do fiscal analysis for the concern which include
Past public presentation: utilizing past public presentation of some twelvemonth say three to five old ages to compare the present public presentation.
Future performace: this besides involve utilizing past ratios and using utilizing statistical method to foretell the hereafter utilizing present and future valve.
Comparative public presentation: this is comparing the informations from two similar house.
I will be analysing and comparing the fiscal ratios of coca Cola and Pepsi.
Among my comparisng among these two company includes the followers
( Porter, SWOT, STEEPLE )
Ratio analysis ( liquidness, profitableness, plus direction, debt direction, market ratios. )
Growth.
Degree of Operating Leverage ( DOL ) , Degree of Financial Leverage ( DFL ) .Degree of Combined Leverage ( DCL ) .
Working capital policy.
Debt struture and hazard.
I will get down with the ratio analysis.
Liquid: It is the extend to which an plus can be bought or sold with out altering the plus ‘s price.Liquidity besides measures the company ‘s ability to pay short-run obiligation.It can be measured by four ways.
Liquidity ratio for Coca Cola
Ratio Analysis
28-Dec-08
30-Dec-07
31-Dec-06
Net Working Capital= CA-CL
-97,778
30,032
-1,8
Current Ratio= CA/CL
0.717
1.245
0.993
Quick Ratio = ( CA-INVT ) /CL
0.528
0.846
0.723
Cash Ratio= ( Cash+MS ) /CL
0.131
0.062
0.248
Liqiudity ratio for Pepsi
Ratio Analysis
27-Dec-08
29-Dec-07
30-dec-06
Net Working Capital= CA-CL
2,019,000
2,398,000
2,270,000
Current Ratio= CA/CL
1.230
1.309
1.331
Quick Ratio = ( CA-INVT ) /CL
0.943
1.014
1.050
Cash Ratio= ( Cash+MS ) /CL-
0.235
0.117
0.241
What does this Numberss means or what they try to state the us about the company.
Net Working Capital: it shows us the company efficiency and it fiscal wellness in the short-run. With positive net working capital the company can run into it short-run responsibilty while with negative it can non and may take to job in the hereafter. As I have calculated from the tabular arraies aboves of the net working capital of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi and see that Coca-Cola is more in the negative espcially in the twelvemonth 2006, and 2008 comparison to the Pepsi who has a really strong positive figures in the three old ages calculated. This means that Pepsi has more fiscal stableness than Coca-Cola and can run into it ‘s short-run liabilities than Coca-cola if they can.
Current Ratio: it is besides know as liqiudity ratio. This shows the company the grade to which they can run into their short term liabilites ( debt and collectible ) with the company ‘s short term assets ( hard currency, stock lists and receivable ) . The higher the ratio the more likely the company can pay easy. At the same clip if the ratio is much higher than 1 it can besides state the company if it keeps excessively much hard currency or stock lists which can be re-invested in the company instead than maintaining. And if it is less than 1 means the company can non pay off it liabilities if it was to come at this point, but does non necessary mean the concern will travel bankrupt even if it tells us the company is non in good fiscal wellness. From the tabular arraies in the old page we can see that the current ratio of the two companies. As before Pepsi is in much better fiscal form than Coca-Cola, with Pepsi holding good above 1 can run into any liabilites immediates from the three old ages calculated but for Coca-Cola merely the twelvemonth 2007 was the lone clip from the three old ages calculated that it can run into it duty and twelvemonth 2008 was much worse.
Quick Ratio: this tells a company about it short-run liquidness. The speedy ratio measures a company ‘s ability to run into it ‘s short-run duty with its most liquid assets. Harmonizing to fiscal analyst quick ration is a more conservative manner to cipher company ‘s short-run tally than current ration. This is because stock lists are excluded from the company ‘s current assets because company ‘s can hold job turning their stock lists to hard currency rapidly. And if there is a short term liabilities to be paid so stock lists can assist. The higher the speedy ratio the bbetter postion the company is. Again we can see from the deliberate tabular arraies on the old page Pepsi is in much better fiscal form than Coca-Cola in all the three old ages we calculated.
Cash Ratio: The most conservative liquidness ratio for judging the fiscal stableness of a company on a short-run footing. This is because stock lists and history receivable are left from the equation. This two elements are of import but since they have non been made in to hard currency or can be difficult to do into hard currency, it may non be used to run into short-run liabilities. This is normally used by creditors to find how much debt they will be willing to widen to the inquiring party.
The following ratio analysis I will be ciphering and analyisis is the plus direction.
II. Asset Management: this ratio is use to mensurate how the company has used it assets to bring forth gross. It besides give us a expression how sucessful the recognition policy and stock list direction of the company ‘s are. Most investors are more interested in the this ratio analysis than other. The tabular array below shows the computations of the plus direction for both Coca-Cola and Pepsi.
Asset direction ratio for coca-cola.
Asset Management
28-Dec-08
30-Dec-07
31-Dec-06
Entire Assset Turnover=S/Average Total Asset
0.468
0.481
0.456
Account Receivable Turnover=S/Average Account Receivable
5.290
5.963
5.942
Account Receivable Period=365/AR Turnover
68.998
61.211
61.427
Inventory Turnover=Sales/ INVT
9.393
9.777
9.285
Inventory period= 365/INVT Employee turnover
38.859
37.333
39.311
Asset direction ratio for Pepsi
Asset Management
28-Dec-08
30-Dec-07
31-Dec-06
Entire Assset Turnover=S/Average Total Asset
0.636
0.619
0.647
Account Receivable Turnover=S/Average Account Receivable
4.890
4.884
5.201
Account Receivable Period=365/AR Turnover
74.642
74.734
70.179
Inventory Turnover=sale/INVT
9.080
9.361
10.060
Inventory period= 365/INVT Employee turnover
40.198
38.992
36.282
What does this Numberss means or what they try to state the us about the company.
Entire Asset Employee turnover: This step how efficient a company is change overing it ‘s plus to revenue.If it non good so it besides tells the company to happen other assets that can bring forth gross revenues. The higher the more efficent the company is turning it ‘s plus to gross. It can besides state us about the monetary value scheme in the sense that the higher this ratio means the lower lower net income and those with lower figure have a higher net income. We can see from the tabular array above that that Pepsi has a higher entire plus turnover than Coca-Cola, which means it is more efficient than the Coca-Cola company, but on the manus coca-Cola makes more net income than Pepsi does.
Account Receivable Employee turnover: this besides show how effectivity a company is in change overing its plus to gross revenues and widening it to it ‘s credittors and collection of it ‘s debts. A higher figure means that the company either is runing in hard currency footing or its extension of recognition and aggregation of histories receivable is efficient. In this section we conclude that Coca-Cola is more effectual in the are of giving recognition and roll uping it accounts receivable much better than Pepsi does.
Account Receivable Time period: the history receivables indicates how long, on norm, it takes for the house to roll up on its gross revenues to clients on recognition. This ratio is besides known as the Days ‘ Gross saless Outstanding ( DSO ) or Average Collection Period ( ACP ) . On mean Coca-cola does roll up their money from creditors much faster than pepsi the difference between them is approximately 10days from the computation above.
Inventory Employee turnover: This shows us how the companys stock lists are sold and replace in a given period of clip. A low turnover shows that there is a batch of stock lists in the company and really hapless gross revenues. This is bad for a company because it investing in the invetories is doing back nil and if monetary values should fall so the company might be in problem. Well a higher turnover means good gross revenues or in-effective purchasing by the company every bit good. Both companies that is Coca-Cola and Pepsi seems to be about equal, so neither of them is making better than the other. Possibly Pepsi does better but it truly so near.
Inventory Time period: this shows us on mean how long stock lists sits in the company shops unsold. The higher the twenty-four hours the hapless the companys gross revenues. Besides both companies have indistinguishable numbers.There is no 1 making better than the other excessively in this country.
The following fiscal ration I will be discoursing about is the debt direction ratio.
III Debt Management: it gives an penetration to the extend the company can borrow money for its operation.Usually proprietor and creditors are interested in this ratio because it give the hazard postion of the company.
The tabular arraies below shows the assorted debt direction ratios for both Coca-cola and Pepsi.
Debt direction ratio for Pepsi
Debt Management
2008
2007
2006
Debt Ratio= TL/TA
0.664
0.502
0.484
Debt/Equity Ratio= TL/E
1.958
1.010
0.938
Fiscal Leverage Multipler=TA/E
2.950
2.010
1.938
Time Interest Earned=EBIT/INT
22.340
35.067
30.243
Debt direction for Coca-Cola
Debt Management
2008
2007
2006
Debt Ratio= TL/TA
0.942
0.907
0.931
Debt/Equity Ratio= TL/E
16.243
9.720
13.523
Fiscal Leverage Multipler=TA/E
17.243
10.720
14.523
Time Interest Earned=EBIT/INT
1.442
1.677
1.620
What does this figure demo the company involved.
Debt Ratio: this step the companys debts to its assets. It is calculated by spliting the entire debt by entire plus. If the debt ratio is greater than 1 it means the company has more debt than it plus can cover. And opposite is the instance if the debt ratio is less than 1 so the company has more plus than debt and besides show the company fiscal wellness. Most investors looks at this ratio to hold an thought of the company hazard. When we look at the figure in the tabular array above we can see that that the debt ratio for Coca-Cola is about 1 and that of Pepsi is much smaller which suggest that Pepsi has more plus comparison to its debt than Coca-Cola. Pepsi is in a better fiscal wellness than Coca-Cola.
Debt/Equity Ratio: it is calculated by the entire liability by the stockholders equity. Sometime long clip liability can be used alternatively of entire liability this is when we are sing merely involvement. It measures a companys fiscal purchase. A high Numberss tells us that a company is financing it growing with debt really aggresively. It accumulate debt for turning. It can pay off with high gaining. We can see from the deliberate tabular array above that Coca-Cola has a really high debt/equity ratio to Pepsi which suggest that Coca-Cola is sharply doing debt to finance it growing than Pepsi. It besides show Pepsi is roll uping less debt than Coca-Cola.
Fiscal purchase Multillier: A higher ratio indicates possible trouble in paying involvement. Coca-Cola will hold more trouble in paying it debt than Pepsi because it has a really big figure.
Time Interest Earned: It calculated by by spliting the companys gaining beofre involvement and revenue enhancement by involvement. It is besides usage to mensurate the company ability to pay back it debt. A big figure means that the company possibly paying it debt with its earnign which can be used for other undertaking. Pepsi has a really big figure comparison with Coca-Cola. Pepsi is utilizing most of it gaining to pay off it debt which can be used to do other undertaking and borrow at a low cost.
IV. Profitableness
It is used to measure a companys ability to bring forth earning as compared to it ‘s disbursals.
The tabular arraies below show different ways in which profitableness ration can be calculated and I will be making for both companies that is Pepsi and Coca-Cola.
Profitability ratio for Pepsi
Profitableness
2008
2007
2006
Gross net income Margin =
GP/S=
0.529
0.543
0.551
Operating Net income Margin=
EBIT/S
0.170
0.199
0.206
Pre-Tax net income Margin=
EBT/S
0.162
0.193
0.199
Net Net income Margin=
EAC/S
0.119
0.143
0.161
NOPAT Margin=
NOPAT/S
EBITDA Margin=
EBITDA/S
Roe
EAC/E
0.421
0.328
0.365
ROA
EAC/TA
0.143
0.163
0.189
Roc
NOPAT/ ( LTL+E )
BEP
EBIT/TA
0.204
0.227
0.241
Profitability ratio for Coca-Cola
Profitableness
Gross net income Margin =
GP/S
0.420
0.433
0.435
Operating Net income Margin=
EBIT/S
0.039
0.056
0.057
Pre-Tax net income Margin=
EBT/S
0.012
0.022
0.022
Net Net income Margin=
EAC/S
0.006
0.014
0.016
NOPAT Margin=
NOPAT/S
EBITDA Margin=
EBITDA/S
Roe
EAC/E
0.119
0.165
0.247
ROA
EAC/TA
0.007
0.015
0.017
Roc
NOPAT/ ( LTL+E )
BEP
EBIT/TA
0.043
0.062
0.017
The above Numberss can bespeak to the following to the company public presentation
Gross Profit Margin: This fiscal measuring measures the companys fiscal wellness demoing what is left of the gross after the cost of good or service has been removed from the gross. In the tabular arraies aboves Pepsi has a gross net income border of 0.529 in the twelvemonth 2008, which means that for every dollar in gross revenues ( gross ) , Pepsi has =.529 to cover its basic operating cost and profit.The higher the ratio the better place the company is. Comparing the gross net income border of Pepsi with the Coca-Cola, Pepsi is somewhat making better than Coca-Cola.
Operating Net income Margin: This fiscal ratio tells us about the pricing scheme of the company and the efficiency of its operation. This besides demo how much money is left is after paying for some operations such as rewards, and natural stuffs. If a company can pay its fixed cost without any job so it runing net income border is good and the company is in a good fiscal wellness. The higher the border the beeter the company is and a company should compare it margin annually to see the alteration and besides with its rivals since this border shows what the company earns before revenue enhancement and involvement. Comparing three old ages change in the operating border of Pepsi and Coca-Cola, we see that Pepsi is making much better than Coca-Cola in this country. The pricing scheme and runing efficiency of Pepsi is better than that of Coca-Cola.
Basic Gaining Power: This ratios shows the houses gaining on power before the influence and taxes.The amount of net income revenue enhancements and involvement alterations divided by entire assets gives the BEP. Pepsi has a much higher ratio than Coca-Cola which shows that Pepsi has a much gaining power than Coca-Cola.
Tax return on Assetss: Measures of managerial public presentation is the ratio of income to average entire assets, both before revenue enhancement and after revenue enhancement. As the Numberss above show three old ages of ROA in both companies it shows that Pepsi direction are doing the best usage of their assets to bring forth more net income than Coca-Cola are making.
Tax return on Equity: This ratio defined as net income divided by mean common shareholder ‘s equity. The most of import difference between ROA and ROE is due to the fiscal purchase. It measures a houses efficiency at bring forthing net income from every dollars of net assets ( assets minus liabilities ) , and shows how good a company uses investing dollars to bring forth earning growing. The figure in the above tabular arraies shows that Pepsi is making much better utilizing it investing to gain growing than Coca-Cola is making.

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!

GET UNIQUE ESSAY

We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read