The storyteller ‘s sentiment in East of Eden goes so farther than merely to suggest the narrative of Cain and Able is the revenant narration of human history, ” but affirms that there is no other narrative ” ( 411 ) . The storyteller continues saying that every person since Adam and Eve has wrestled with the punctilious pick between good and evil. When looking back on his or her life, the storyteller contests each individual has one inquiry to inquire, will hold left merely the difficult, clean inquiries: Be it good or was it evil? Have I done well-or ailment ” ( 411 ) . Steinbeck ‘s blunt unveiling of his worldview roots itself deeper than merely the storyteller. Lee, in East of Eden, states that the narrative of Cain and Abel is the symbol narrative of the human psyche ” ( 268 ) . However, Steinbeck ‘s kibbitzing on humanity ‘s symbol narrative is skewed by his decision. Steinbeck concludes that while life is a battle between taking good and evil, we make our ain way. The symbol narrative of humanity is non merely battle of good and evil, but instead the battle and licking of immorality.
All the characters in East of Eden act out this play and go embroiled with its awful results. However, each character in East of Eden has different attitudes towards their free will throughout their web with evil. Cathy persists that the universe consists of merely evil, so she decides to steep herself in it and use it to her advantage. Cathy learns that she can utilize evil to work other character ‘s human weaknesses to farther profit her ain selfish desires. Aaron, on the other manus, is merely able to see the good in the universe and nil else. After larning that his female parent did non really decease but alternatively left the male childs to be a whorehouse proprietor, Aaron is so afloat with emotion that he runs off. Lee is the lone character in East of Eden that can be argued to hold successfully distanced himself from the play. However, even Lee ‘s narrative of beginning is plagued with immorality and dismaying actions. His chief function in this play is to wade in the background softly reminding the reader that immorality can be overcome and that morality is a free pick, irrespective of the fact that all worlds are imperfect, iniquitous existences. Cal is a in-between route between these two extreme characters. Throughout the narrative Cal struggles between being evil and good, this is straight seen by his petition of Lee, Do n’t allow me be mean ” ( 377 ) . Fortunately by the decision of the book Cal is successful, as he learns to accept Lee ‘s belief of freewill. Although we are ne’er told, it is hoped that Cal subsequently takes this belief with him following the decision of the book to populate an honorable life with Abra.
As in all of Steinbeck ‘s novels, the character development is at the centre of the narrative. In East of Eden Steinbeck presents characters in braces: Aaron and Caleb, Abra and Cathy, Adam and Charles ; utilizing first initials to ab initio sort which characters are per se good and which characters will wrestle with the seeds of immorality within them. These categorizations based on initials refer back to the scriptural narrative of Cain and Abel. Each of the characters get downing with the missive C ” ab initio embody evil in the narrative, while those get downing with A ” embody good. However, as the narrative progresses the unequivocal lines of good and immoralities are blurred by the characters arbitrary actions that go against their characterized name. Steinbeck does this to exemplify his two major points of the novel foremost that every individual sets their ain way in life and 2nd that immorality can ever be overcome. East of Eden embellishes this ageless struggle between good and evil in the simplified set of the Salinas Valley as a whole and more specifically in the persons of the Trask and Hamilton households. The chief characters of the novel, coevals after coevals, wrestling with the job of immorality. Cyrus, the patriarch of the Trask household, chooses evil by stealing $ 10,000 throughout his employment at the U.S. War Board. Adam, the supporter at constitution of the narrative, is a lovingness but imperfect character. Adam ‘s largest defects are his leaning to be excessively naif and his failure to detect evil features in others. It is these defects that blind him from detecting his male parent ‘s corruptness and Cathy ‘s use. As the narrative advancements and Adam begins to age till eventually going a male parent, his nonliteral character of Abel alterations and he leans more towards a metaphorical character of scriptural Adam. Adam, like scriptural Adam, is incapable to detect his ain discriminatory intervention for Aaron over Cal, which proves damaging to the household. Adam lavishes all of his love and attending on the weak and detached Aaron while mostly composing off the more loving and thoughtful Cal. Ultimately, nevertheless, Lee causes Adam to recognize Cal ‘s possible, and Adam redeems Cal by blessing him at the terminal of the novel.
Cathy chooses the way of immorality at every chance, aching and pull stringsing others for her ain benefit. Cathy is the personification of immorality in East of Eden and the most dead of the chief characters. A symbol of barrenness and devastation who kills her parents and efforts to abort her ain unborn kids, Cathy is a pillaged edition of the scriptural Eve, seen in Christian society as the female parent of all world. Eve is deceived into perpetrating wickedness, whereas Cathy embraces it enthusiastically and commits evil merely for its ain interest. Cathy has a crushingly glooming mentality on world, as she believes that the universe is made of evil and, hence, the lone manner to populate is to encompass it ( Barnes 160 ) . Consequently, she falls short in understanding the good in extra characters and alternatively uses their trusting natures to accomplish her ain predatory terminals. There is ne’er a sense throughout the narrative that Cathy is really utilizing her evil Acts of the Apostless for an ultimate end or purpose. Due to this aimless immorality, some critics have dismissed Cathy as an implausible character and a major weak nexus in Steinbeck ‘s novel ” ( Atkinson 210 ) . No affair the analysis by some critics, Cathy is a symbol of the human immorality that will ever be present in the universe, ” and her loss of power over Adam and Cal strengthens East of Eden ‘s message that persons have the pick to reject immorality in favour of good ( Mazzeno 30 ) .
While Adam is the supporter throughout most of the novel, the limelight displacements to Cal in the ulterior chapters. Cal struggles the most of all the characters due to the moral connexion he has with his female parent. Early on on it seems that Cal has inherited the evil inclinations of his female parent, Cathy, and that his is destined to carry through this coevals ‘s character function of Cain. Early on Cal does expose the features of a Cain figure. Cal becomes violently covetous of Aaron because of Adam ‘s noticeable disposition towards him, and finally sets in gesture the proceedings that lead to Aaron ‘s decease, even expressing a analogue of the scriptural Cain ‘s response to God, Am I my brother ‘s keeper. ” Although Cal is seemingly born ” into the glooming function of a modern twenty-four hours Cain, he struggles against what he sees as his familial immorality, the immorality of his female parent, and even prays to God to set him on the way toward good. Even though Cal does do several pathetic moral picks as he wrestles with immorality, in the terminal he takes Lee ‘s advocate and recognizes the power of timshel, the thought that each person has the power to take between good and evil in life ” ( Barnes 162 ) . Therefore, while Cal is so a Cain figure, he demonstrates the ability to interrupt out of familial wickedness and act for good alternatively.
Aaron, like his male parent, is bighearted and unquestioning. Although Aaron is sort and good-humored, his natural moral sensitiveness is inordinate, doing him delicate and without uncertainty vulnerable to being hurt. The protected Aaron encounters enormous trouble confronting the world of human immorality in the universe, ” and Steinbeck builds a huge sum of suspense in the 2nd half of East of Eden refering whether or non Aaron will last his first brush with his female parent. Gradually, Aaron retreats into the shelter of the church, rejecting the love of Abra in favour of spiritual Torahs of celibacy and devotedness. As the novel develops, Aaron becomes less sympathetic, as the reader begins to see that the shelters he seeks are shallow and that his chases are driven neither by true spiritual belief nor a desire for rational instruction ” ( Atkinson 216 ) . Ultimately, Aaron is shattered by the revelation that Cathy is his purportedly deceased female parent. He runs from the evil world, enlisting in the ground forces, and subsequently is killed in World War I.
While the narrative is plagued by an immorality that is native and inevitable to human will, the novel besides sets forth optimism that immorality may be overcome. Lee, a Chinese retainer, surprises and delectations the reader with his wisdom and soft nature. Cathy surpasses the conventional evil character, leting the reader to experience empathy side by side with repugnance. This double emotional response was planned by Steinbeck to demo that no one individual is all good or all evil ( Gladstein 36 ) . Steinbeck inculcates the reader that each person has the freedom to pick immorality or good no affair their fortunes. This indispensable thought of free pick is summarized by the Hebrew word timshel, the concluding word spoken by Adam in the book before go throughing off. The Hebrew word, which translates to thou mayest, ” appears in the narrative of Cain and Abel in the Bible, and besides at the decision of East of Eden. In the Genesis four, God instructions Cain to go a maestro over the immorality he wrestles with. Timshel does non intend that he must get the better of immorality or assure Cain that he will ; instead, it reminds Cain of the chance to get the better of evil exists. Ironically, in the novel, Lee, the Chinese Presbyterian, petitions a group of Confucian bookmans to explicate the significance of timshel. The novel goes on to narrate that these bookmans spent months of reading and analyzing Hebrew boulder clay eventually they give Lee the reply: Thou mayest. ” This individual word evolves to go the whirl on which this novel perpetuates. Lee sees this impression of free will as vital to the fallen human status ; in fact, he says that timshel might be the most of import word in the universe ” ( 602 ) . The philosophical treatment of timshel manipulates the psychological battles of the novel. Through Steinbeck ‘s narrative of each character ‘s battle with evil and its affect on the human head, the reader sees upseting snapshots of the human psyche ‘s innate darkness. One illustration of this is the clients at Kate ‘s house of harlotry, who exemplify the assortments of torture and perversion caused by the human head. Timshel besides reveals to the reader hope, in its concluding visual aspect in the novel. At the decision of the novel when Adam, bedridden by a shot, murmurs the word to Caleb, following his confession of the immorality he has committed by doing Aaron to run into his once thought dead female parent. Ultimately, the fresh terminals on a positive note, as Cal accepts the possibility and duty of free will, of free pick between good and evil. This optimistic stoping is tempered, nevertheless, by our cognition that future coevalss will infinitely play back the same battle that Cal and his ascendants have endured. The paramount message of East of Eden seems to be that world is free to take their way regardless of heritage or fortunes, in fact, possibly in malice of them.